Ban - sweet teen

[amonty1144]

Please ban this nasty piece of cr*p.
She is nasty and malicious, leave a grieving woman's family in peace.

[B00]

why?

She's entitled to her opinion the same as everyone else. Although I have to agree that there was no need for the level of nastiness in that particular question, I'm willing to bet she added those words for shock value, and they obviously worked.

If you're really that bothered by her, try emailing the Ed privately.

[4getmenot]

oh come on she comes on here to abuse people, that question was out of order thats why its gone. cant ban her though but at least question has gone

[China Doll]

If you dislike her use the report button or email Ed.

[smi_ffy]

Difference in opinion with 4getmenot? Simple solution. Ban them!

[B00]

of course it was 4get- that's why she does it, for the shock value.

However, dont you think a question/post like this is also amusing to her?

We have choices here.....

Ignore
Answer without flaming
or report.

Flaming the girl is clearly not working is it?

[theonlyone]

Who ever S~T is they have to live with what they have posted , they are sick in the head , and we all know it's Ruskie , also thought they were off to Uni in Outer Mongolia ?? Broadband is not to good there so fingers Xed !!

[B00]

why are they sick?

Just because she/they post those words, it doesnt necessarily (that word again!) mean they believe them. As i'm getting tired of repeating- they are posted for shock value and nothing else.

STOP FEEDING THE TROLLS.

[Neilzulu1]

Bang out of order. Ban will not happen, but we can all agree to totally ignore whatever sweet teen chooses to post in the future.

[Shadow Man]

What was the question?, sadly I missed it

[smi_ffy]

Group ignore. How fun! Does "we" all incorporate me too ?

[B00]

i'm sorry, but i refuse to be part of this "we", if i want to reply to her posts i will do.

Despite the nasty attitude in the now removed question, I partly agreed with her sentiments.

If the post serious questions/points then I'm going to answer her.

[amonty1144]

Her post said that Jane Tomlinson was not a hero but as usual in more inflammatory terms...of course.
Very nasty, very sick
I suspect sweet teen / ruskie is in need of some good psychiatric care.

[Neilzulu1]

You do that then. It is your choice. I am still going to hammer you on wow. Level 32 now. Lol.

[smi_ffy]

Why not post that? If you beleive in something why change your opinion to "fit in".

[B00]

pffft neil, notta chance babes ;-)

And as unlikely as it sounds, I agree with smiffy!

[amonty1144]

If there was a genuine point or question in the post , it would not be an issue.
However, the post was posted in a manner to cause offence.

[darlingnc]

who's Jane Tomlinson?

[4getmenot]

I did report it BOO, and smonty you are simply putting up what she has put for all to see again

[B00]

i thought there was a genuine point- she said she believed that she wasn't a hero as she (Jane Tomlinson) was only a campaigner for cancer charities because she herself had cancer. Surely that's a valid point? Just because you may disagree, it doesn't negate the point being made.

[amonty1144]

AS others have pointed out in this thread, they are entitled to hold their opinion, so why can't I repeat what she has said, even if I very strongly disagree.

I notice none of her alternate personalities have sought to defend herself, or have they?