Before I opened the link I had a picture of the solvent abusers as ugly feral peasant children wearing baseball caps and stolen sportswear. Surprise, surprise when I did view the link I was right.
Teenagers have a brain and teenagers have a free will. If they want to sniff glue it is on their own volition and desire to get high.
Unless they are COMPLETE morons (i.e institutionalised with some severe mental disability) they know the dangers involved. Much the same as with cigarettes and alcohol abuse.
Now I am not saying the lad deserved to die, because no doubt that we make me sound like a heartless old bar steward, but thinking of all the benefits he and, later, his foul offspring will reap from my taxes, the criminal behaviour he already undertakes and the progressions of such behaviour further on in life, his mother may take comfort from the fact his death was probably a good thing.
Unlike some drug abuse, mostly cocaine, solvent abuse is probably 99.9999 percent reserved for poor, ignorant criminal children who have no value in a civilised society. If you gathered together 10 boys from decent stable family backgrounds who respect their teachers and pat the family dog and 10 boys from, say, Cardiff, and placed 20 tubes of "Uhu Super strenght" on a table, I will bet my house the good kids will glue together some AirFix toys whilst the fatherless and Kappa wearing scum will have a little sniff.
I despise mentioning class issues, because I may come accross as a snob, but solvent abuse really is not an issue for decent society. Therefore to answer the question, I refuse to spend even more of my money on schools to teach these foul children things which are common sense to normal people. The dangers are already documented.
If their mothers only kept their legs shut instead of breeding like randy rabbits to get even more money from the DSS, they wouldn't be crying