Hi everyone.
I wonder if it's the way we have governed alcohol consumption in our society which makes a difference? In England The Pub has traditionally been the province of adults. Drinking alcohol at home is a fairly recent development. Drinking wine is also a relatively recent development. Probably because we never used to make any of our own and brewed alcohol from grains - beer, whisky etc. - which is a lot more difficult to DIY hence 'The Pub'.
On the continent, where most countries make their own wine, it's been a part of family social culture for ages. Children are allowed to join in - watered down and in small amounts yes - but alcohol is not solely the province of adults like it has always been here (until recently). That's not to say that the incidences of alcohol related illness is lesser there, but the anti-social consequences that are always hitting the headlines here don't seem to be a part of their culture.
Maybe that's why young people go a bit wild when they get to the age that they can go into a pub and buy a drink.
Other than that I agree with legend (Woah! Hold On! (lol) ) that some people are anti-social to differing degrees. When I get S**t-faced, I dance till I can't stand up and go home to sleep. I drink sleeping beer. Some people drink fighting beer, some people drink crying beer, some people drink shameless beer. I think it just accentuates whatever your basic nature or mood is at the time.
And so many people in our society today are so angry.
Our society didn't invent alcohol, but we overindulge because most of us feel angry, disappointed, disillusioned, powerless and generally hope-less.
Should that change, then so to (probably) would our need to escape into a haze of mind-numbing drunkeness.