Only The A F D Can Save Germany
News6 mins ago
evolution/technology.
i reckon that humans have stopped evolving because of technology ie medicine allowing many more people to survive rather than survival of the fittest. but if technology was developing slower than the rate of evolution would we still evolve. OR are we evolving but slower OR are people living in the modern world not evolving and people such as the nomads who havent developed much for a couple of thousand years still evolving OR is even their rate of advancement to quick for them to evolve anymore OR is everyone stil evolving but because of timescales its hard to see?
Answers
1 to 7 of 7
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by nix-j-c. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
In the conventional sense you are correct, essentially mankind has slowed or halted traditional "survival of the fittest" evolution. However what if the state of intelligence and therefore the ability to advance technologically was in fact a sort of evolution overdrive, ie a bit like a runner evolving to be able to do a 4 minute mile and at the same time inventing the car to make that unnecessary. Food for thought!
I cannot remember the source, but I recently read that humans are evolving rapidly. We have very recently gained lactose tolerance, colored eyes, pale skins and much more.
Without more gene sharing, the various racial groups will become species
As an aside, it is chimps, not humans, that have changed most genetically since we diverged even though the appearance of humans would seem to contradict this.
Without more gene sharing, the various racial groups will become species
As an aside, it is chimps, not humans, that have changed most genetically since we diverged even though the appearance of humans would seem to contradict this.
1 to 7 of 7
