News0 min ago
Morality.
25 Answers
Should morality play a part in the drafting of laws?
Or shoul all laws be written with regard only to principles of legality with no regard to morality?
Or shoul all laws be written with regard only to principles of legality with no regard to morality?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by 123everton. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.I don't think they are mutually exclusive - infact some might argue that you can get a pretty good idea of what a particular society considers to be moral by looking at their laws.
Thing is whilst there is pretty general agreement on some areas of morality, there is wide spread disagreement in other areas.
Areas like sexual behaviour, recreational drugs, reckless behaviour for example are all areas where you will find widely different ideas on what is or is not morally acceptable
Thing is whilst there is pretty general agreement on some areas of morality, there is wide spread disagreement in other areas.
Areas like sexual behaviour, recreational drugs, reckless behaviour for example are all areas where you will find widely different ideas on what is or is not morally acceptable
Unsure I understand the question. Any legal principles should be based in morality anyway shouldn't they ? What is the point of law unless it is to define what is right and acceptable, and conversely what is wrong and not tolerated in society ?
As for no such thing as a moral standard, well of course there is. The standards are whatever is agreed to be the standards after society have debated the issues.
As for no such thing as a moral standard, well of course there is. The standards are whatever is agreed to be the standards after society have debated the issues.
Ok............it's an oldie but a goodie...............and should test theories of morality/legality.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Spanner
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Spanner
That's fine, it's not the point, take the film "Cape Fear" there are scenes in that which were edited out in Arab countries (only the sound remained) with the picture frozen, there are other films like "Hostel" which I believe is basically just torture porn, how can the live action stuff be legal and the cartoon not?
You could do a gay porn version of Popeye so long as it wasn't animated it'd be ok.
You could do a gay porn version of Popeye so long as it wasn't animated it'd be ok.
I remember that case from way back when, I was appaled at the ruling, their kinky back door shenanigans are certainly not my cup of tea, but again it emphasises the point.
What power should the law wield in the sexual activities of consenting adults?
Ultimately morality can only ever be brought to bear on matters of a sexual nature, perhaps the law is sexually repressed?
Although it shouldn't be what with all those wigs they wear in court.
What power should the law wield in the sexual activities of consenting adults?
Ultimately morality can only ever be brought to bear on matters of a sexual nature, perhaps the law is sexually repressed?
Although it shouldn't be what with all those wigs they wear in court.