I don�t see this as being a very complex issue. Granted, there may have been some overlaps of communications or letters. However, I feel this is not essential to the matter at hand. In the following, I�m eliminating the �who� aspect�merely the audit trail details�which is how this matter would be measured.
As I understand it. You used someone else�s card to book a flight.
That card authorisation was subsequently denied, withdrawn or cancelled.
This caused your PNR (passenger name record) or �booking� to be cancelled.
You wish to receive compensation for this.
As you were not the owner of the card, regardless of how its number was facilitated, disseminated, and subsequently withdrawn (regardless of the instrument that caused this), you have no recourse for ownership of that transaction. The ownership of that transaction is with the cardholder.
You are seeking compensation of varying degrees. Again, as you are not the account holder, application and consideration would rest with the cardholder.
I certainly understand your exasperation with the matter. Sadly, those most simple tests as I�ve outlined above, would determine ownership and rights.
I wish I could offer you a more favourable view. However, I�m afraid this is pretty close to how it would be interpreted through a legal test.
I wish you every success
Fr Bill