ChatterBank3 mins ago
Is Britain being taken for a ride?
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-17335368
As though we haven't heard the last of unconvicted terrorists sue-ing us for a £1 apiece because of US torture we will now see victims or their families suffering casualties by US drone attacks demanding compensation via no win-no fee lawyers.
How should we react to this?
As though we haven't heard the last of unconvicted terrorists sue-ing us for a £1 apiece because of US torture we will now see victims or their families suffering casualties by US drone attacks demanding compensation via no win-no fee lawyers.
How should we react to this?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by rov1100. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.No one was a terrorist. These were a group of town elders having a meeting. We cocked up and told the Americans to murder the wrong people. We are not at war with Pakistan and the action was highly illegal on many levels. If Hague and the British Government are guilty (this trial will decide) then we should cough up. And be more careful in future.
SP, there are many unconvicted terrorists. Anyone involved in terroriism and not caught yest is an unconvicted terrorist so why is it a strange term?
To answer the question, as Gromit says we need to wait to see what comes out of the trial really to have the facts to comment. If we have made an error then yes, we have to pay up.
To answer the question, as Gromit says we need to wait to see what comes out of the trial really to have the facts to comment. If we have made an error then yes, we have to pay up.
This is not the first mistake. Wedding gatherings have also been bombed in the past.
http://www.guardian.c...dding-party-explosion
Mistakes happen in war, but it seems that virtually no proof is needed before an attack on a gathering of Afghan civilians is ordered.
http://www.guardian.c...dding-party-explosion
Mistakes happen in war, but it seems that virtually no proof is needed before an attack on a gathering of Afghan civilians is ordered.