News0 min ago
Ultimatum Game
31 Answers
Listening to a program on Game theory - ended on this rather interesting one.
You're given £100 - you have to offer me some of it
If I accept you keep the change
If I refuse we both get nothing
How much are you going to offer me?
(No right answer to this just interested in people's perpectives)
You're given £100 - you have to offer me some of it
If I accept you keep the change
If I refuse we both get nothing
How much are you going to offer me?
(No right answer to this just interested in people's perpectives)
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by jake-the-peg. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Is it? I've not seen that
It's a classic game theory problem because analytically you'd be best to offer me 1p
Being "rational" I should accept that over nothing - but that's not what happens in practice.
In practice people feel insulted and their sense of fairness kicks in
So what would you offer then?
It's a classic game theory problem because analytically you'd be best to offer me 1p
Being "rational" I should accept that over nothing - but that's not what happens in practice.
In practice people feel insulted and their sense of fairness kicks in
So what would you offer then?
there's nothing particularly "rational" about accepting 1p. I wouldn't even bend over to pick up a 1p coin. It's not quite worthless but near as dammit and you could argue that just the mere effort of carrying it around outweighs the value of spending it. So I suspect I just wouldn't bother accepting money until it became an economically significant amount. 10p might do it?
I'll assume they know you've got £100 to play with.
If it was me I'd offer them £50. It wouldn't be necessary - you could probably get away with alot less - £5 would probably be accepted in most cases, but it would be a gesture of fairness which would pretty much guarantee we both went away with £50. Only an idiot would snub the offer of a 50/50 split.
This assumes that there are no other factors at play (e.g I absolutely need to come away with a minumum £80 to pay off my gambling debts and avoid having my kneecaps broken) and that anything I come away with is 'free' money.
If it was me I'd offer them £50. It wouldn't be necessary - you could probably get away with alot less - £5 would probably be accepted in most cases, but it would be a gesture of fairness which would pretty much guarantee we both went away with £50. Only an idiot would snub the offer of a 50/50 split.
This assumes that there are no other factors at play (e.g I absolutely need to come away with a minumum £80 to pay off my gambling debts and avoid having my kneecaps broken) and that anything I come away with is 'free' money.
I must be older and stiffer than you, jd_here.
Yes, it would depend what the offeree knows. If I knew that if I accepted 1p it would get you £99.99, I'd have to have some good reason to agree (eg you are my mum). If all I knew was that you'd said "Would you like 1p?" a whole different set of factors would be in play.
Yes, it would depend what the offeree knows. If I knew that if I accepted 1p it would get you £99.99, I'd have to have some good reason to agree (eg you are my mum). If all I knew was that you'd said "Would you like 1p?" a whole different set of factors would be in play.
Yes everybody knows what the offer is
It's interesting because what is really happening is that people's sense of pride and fair play is kicking in - if you offer too little people feel insulted.
Pschologists have done repeated experiments in different cultures and with varying amounts of money and got reasonably similar effects.
It seems that on average people will refuse if you offer less than about 20%.
It's kind of got knock ons in negotiations - you're likely to get better results if you go in trying to win a majority of what you want rather than trying to win everything and sent the other person away otally empty handed.
I'm trying to think what I'd have offerred before listening - probably 40%
Now? 25%
It's interesting because what is really happening is that people's sense of pride and fair play is kicking in - if you offer too little people feel insulted.
Pschologists have done repeated experiments in different cultures and with varying amounts of money and got reasonably similar effects.
It seems that on average people will refuse if you offer less than about 20%.
It's kind of got knock ons in negotiations - you're likely to get better results if you go in trying to win a majority of what you want rather than trying to win everything and sent the other person away otally empty handed.
I'm trying to think what I'd have offerred before listening - probably 40%
Now? 25%
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.