Quizzes & Puzzles13 mins ago
How Is The Tax Handled On This Transaction?
8 Answers
A relative recently died and left me some stock. How is the tax handled on this transaction? Do I pay the tax when I sell it? Her basis in the stock was very low.
Answers
When you inherited the stock, you received what is commonly referred to as a stepped-up cost basis. That means your relative's low basis in the stock is forgotten, and instead, your new basis is the stock's value on the date of death. Technically, your cost basis is the average of the stock's high and low trading prices on the date of death, not the stock's...
17:56 Thu 03rd Jan 2013
When you inherited the stock, you received what is commonly referred to as a stepped-up cost basis. That means your relative's low basis in the stock is forgotten, and instead, your new basis is the stock's value on the date of death.
Technically, your cost basis is the average of the stock's high and low trading prices on the date of death, not the stock's closing price. If your relative died on a weekend or holiday, then a weighted average of the two nearest open market trading days is used to determine your cost basis. For instance, if your relative died on a Saturday, the average of the high and low trading price on Friday is multiplied by two-thirds, and the Monday high and low average is multiplied by one-third. The two resulting numbers are added together to arrive at the new cost basis.
Technically, your cost basis is the average of the stock's high and low trading prices on the date of death, not the stock's closing price. If your relative died on a weekend or holiday, then a weighted average of the two nearest open market trading days is used to determine your cost basis. For instance, if your relative died on a Saturday, the average of the high and low trading price on Friday is multiplied by two-thirds, and the Monday high and low average is multiplied by one-third. The two resulting numbers are added together to arrive at the new cost basis.
Intringuing that a new punter shows up with a very technical question to be answered some 20 minutes later by someone on only her second shout.
Still the answer seems fair enough. The bit you forgot was to mention that CGT (if payable once any annual allowances are taken) is due on the gain - that is the difference the stock is sold at, less the 'acquiring cost' so eloquently described by the above.
Still the answer seems fair enough. The bit you forgot was to mention that CGT (if payable once any annual allowances are taken) is due on the gain - that is the difference the stock is sold at, less the 'acquiring cost' so eloquently described by the above.
//Intringuing that a new punter shows up with a very technical question to be answered some 20 minutes later by someone on only her second shout. //
It is intruiging buildersmate - but why - there is no company/names quoted .
I dont understand the reason for the post and answer ( if it is not from two totally unknown to each other people )
It is intruiging buildersmate - but why - there is no company/names quoted .
I dont understand the reason for the post and answer ( if it is not from two totally unknown to each other people )
Barmaid (and others)
These two punters appear to be playing sort of silly game in that they are answering each other’s obscure and deeply technical questions.
I'd vaguely heard of stepped-up, but it is USA terminology - explained here (if you are remotely interested).
http:// www.inv estoped ia.com/ terms/s /stepup inbasis .asp#ax zz2GwIF 7IR9
However jamesbishop has now taken it upon himself to answer makay's question - this one.
http:// www.the answerb ank.co. uk/Busi ness-an d-Finan ce/Pers onal-Fi nance/Q uestion 1203448 .html
Perhaps we should just let them get on with it.
These two punters appear to be playing sort of silly game in that they are answering each other’s obscure and deeply technical questions.
I'd vaguely heard of stepped-up, but it is USA terminology - explained here (if you are remotely interested).
http://
However jamesbishop has now taken it upon himself to answer makay's question - this one.
http://
Perhaps we should just let them get on with it.
Hi buildersmate- they have asked and answered each other's questions before.
eg here's the question about safe storage
http:// communi ty.lawy ers.com /forums /p/1280 02/6461 72.aspx
It seems they are a couple who work in Estate Planning in Australia.
Odd, but harmless it seems
eg here's the question about safe storage
http://
It seems they are a couple who work in Estate Planning in Australia.
Odd, but harmless it seems
I thought this answer was OK actually - a more complicated version of 'you buy a newspaper on the day of death and use the stock quotations in that.'
I hadnt lost sleep over the week end calculation
but we would call that an amortisation wouldnt we
( anyone with O level math calls it a linear approximation)
I did wonder about - her basis was very low
but I have just read or re-read Desktops latest pensees
and thought how this one was a proper question
I agree IHT and CGT is confused
but hell no one is paying for this advice.....
I hadnt lost sleep over the week end calculation
but we would call that an amortisation wouldnt we
( anyone with O level math calls it a linear approximation)
I did wonder about - her basis was very low
but I have just read or re-read Desktops latest pensees
and thought how this one was a proper question
I agree IHT and CGT is confused
but hell no one is paying for this advice.....
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.