blimey people are taking this question seriously !
my first reaction was tht the lawyer was trying to save you money.....
Simap is a Spanish case -
https://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld200304/ldselect/ldeucom/67/6706.htm
which i thought was ooman rights - it may have been an employment directive .....[ docgtors resident in hospital and on call are 'at work']
which goes to show the general principle that spanish cases do get to the European courts
oh ! he may have been referring to the lack of interest in human rights cases in mellila and ceuta ( o golly didja see Kay Birley on sky news pronouncing the last one Quetta ? )
https://www.es.amnesty.org/en-que-estamos/noticias/noticia/articulo/ceuta-y-melilla-un-territorio-sin-derechos-para-personas-migrantes-y-refugiadas/
and from this - I imagine you read Spanith - and the anti foreign language brigade ( coz they be forrin see?) hardly ever come here and so THEY wont complain.....[oh god you have to hear them blaart about foreign languages to believe it]
human rights seem in short supply