That's a bit like asking how long a piece of string is.
Depends what you mean by 'deal'. If the only alternative is to continue to rent, then for many people starting to own at least a share of one's own house is something they aspire to.
The reason whay they are more affordable (than buying 100% stake) is because the net cost per month of the 50% mortgage plus whatever 'rent' is payable to the owner of the other 50% stake is less than the cost of the 100% mortgage. So if one can't afford to buy 100% of the property by mortgage, it can work.
The flip-side (I didn't say downside) is that if property values escalate further, one makes less of a capital gain. Depending on the 'deal' the price of the rent paid on the non-owned part might increase over time (check the T&Cs).
Normally with these schemes, one has the right to buy more % of the equity at a later date - but at a higher than the current price, if the capital value has gone up in the meantime.