News1 min ago
Advice on IVA's
3 Answers
I just wanted to check if anyone knows anything about IVAs?
I have approx �25k of debt (before interest - think it goes up to �39k) and Ive been into with a company called Debt Matters for advice. After taking my circumstances, financial information, etc I have been advised that an IVA is my best option to clear my debts.
There are two options for me to travel down ...... I can either pay �250.00 per month for the next 5 yrs to clear these debts with approx 75% of them being written off, or I can pay �74.00 per month for the next 8 months then pay �12k (my redundancy) and be debt free within the year. The IVA will stay on my credit file for 5-6 yrs regardless of which option I select.
Just need to know if anyone has any good or bad experiences with an IVA - also "is my home at risk" even though they have told me it isnt??
Thanks for any advice
I have approx �25k of debt (before interest - think it goes up to �39k) and Ive been into with a company called Debt Matters for advice. After taking my circumstances, financial information, etc I have been advised that an IVA is my best option to clear my debts.
There are two options for me to travel down ...... I can either pay �250.00 per month for the next 5 yrs to clear these debts with approx 75% of them being written off, or I can pay �74.00 per month for the next 8 months then pay �12k (my redundancy) and be debt free within the year. The IVA will stay on my credit file for 5-6 yrs regardless of which option I select.
Just need to know if anyone has any good or bad experiences with an IVA - also "is my home at risk" even though they have told me it isnt??
Thanks for any advice
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by tgm1974. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Be very careful - you may be in danger of being sold a pup - and this is a sales process, not independent altruistic advice.
If you take the first option there is probably nothing to stop them coming after your redundancy money as well (when you get it); also it is quite normal for the IVA to include a requirement to re-mortgage in the fourth year to release equity, or for it to be extended for another 2 or 3 years if this can't be done.
I think it is pretty unlikely that creditors will accept a proposal that writes off about 75% of the debt - this used to happen sometimes but a lot of creditors have become much more reluctant to agree anything like it. This is particularly the case because you have a house & they can - if they get a CCJ & you default on it - get a charge put on it, which secures their debt. NOTE: Above is based on your saying about 75% would be written off, but your figures don't stack up. Over 5 years you would pay �15K, which is 38% of the �39K you quote. If the figures you are quoting are what the firm has given you, it seems maybe to imply a rather shoddy slipshod approach, which is not a good thing when dealing with this type of issue.
Your second option is, on the face of it,somewhat better. You would pay 32% but its over & done with much more quickly - provided it is absolutely clear they cannot add in anything about the house.
If you want to go ahead read and study the proposal document extremely carefully and make certain you fully understand it. If there is anything at all you are not totally clear about query it, but don't rely on verbal information from the firm. Get all your queries properly explained in writing.
It would probably be a good idea for you to contact a free debt advice agency - such as CCCS (see website) - and go over everything with them before making a decision.
If you take the first option there is probably nothing to stop them coming after your redundancy money as well (when you get it); also it is quite normal for the IVA to include a requirement to re-mortgage in the fourth year to release equity, or for it to be extended for another 2 or 3 years if this can't be done.
I think it is pretty unlikely that creditors will accept a proposal that writes off about 75% of the debt - this used to happen sometimes but a lot of creditors have become much more reluctant to agree anything like it. This is particularly the case because you have a house & they can - if they get a CCJ & you default on it - get a charge put on it, which secures their debt. NOTE: Above is based on your saying about 75% would be written off, but your figures don't stack up. Over 5 years you would pay �15K, which is 38% of the �39K you quote. If the figures you are quoting are what the firm has given you, it seems maybe to imply a rather shoddy slipshod approach, which is not a good thing when dealing with this type of issue.
Your second option is, on the face of it,somewhat better. You would pay 32% but its over & done with much more quickly - provided it is absolutely clear they cannot add in anything about the house.
If you want to go ahead read and study the proposal document extremely carefully and make certain you fully understand it. If there is anything at all you are not totally clear about query it, but don't rely on verbal information from the firm. Get all your queries properly explained in writing.
It would probably be a good idea for you to contact a free debt advice agency - such as CCCS (see website) - and go over everything with them before making a decision.
Thanks for your reply - I actually went to the CAB the other day and told them all my history and Id been in contacted with Debt Matters. They have referred me to an independent advisor who deals with this stuff all the time and Im off to see her this Wednesday .... if she reads everything for me and confirms all is in order then I will be taking the 12 month solution as I would only ponder the redundancy away, knowing me. At least I am clear for my next job and can start afresh ...... many thanks
-- answer removed --