Donate SIGN UP

Protectionism - Is it worth trying?

Avatar Image
rov1200 | 21:13 Thu 09th Oct 2008 | Business & Finance
5 Answers
The credit crunch and the disruption to financial markets can only lead to a recession with the loss of millions of jobs. Is it time to rethink our strategy by ensuring that most of the contracts are given to British based companies? If that is not totally possible then because most of our trade is with the EU to restrict our trade there.
There is bound to be a backlash from other countries outside the EU but surely this was why we formed this trade club in the first place.
Countries outside the EU which includes the USA should be on equal import/export arrangements.

Then many of the British jobs would be protected!
Gravatar

Answers

1 to 5 of 5rss feed

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by rov1200. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
In the long run we'd all lose out. We need countries to work together at the moment. That's my view.
People are not interested which is why most British manufacturing firms went to the wall years ago. What people want is cheap tat, they don't care (or to be fair realise) the long term impact.

Question Author
Even though our currency has plummetted against all the other major currencies our exports have failed to rise. I think we are living in parallel worlds at the moment with the bank problem not sorted out and in the real world people losing their jobs, firms going to the wall and a deep recession in the offing. The EU club could solve many of the problems at a stroke. Sarcozy has arranged a meeting so maybe something will come from it.
Question Author

1 to 5 of 5rss feed

Do you know the answer?

Protectionism - Is it worth trying?

Answer Question >>

Related Questions

Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.