Crosswords0 min ago
Andrew Wakefield Rises Again.....
19 Answers
https:/ /www.th eguardi an.com/ society /2018/j ul/18/h ow-disg raced-a nti-vax xer-and rew-wak efield- was-emb raced-b y-trump s-ameri ca
another round of MMR vs Anti-vax, and this time he has the ear of some currently influential Americans. years have passed and yet the fire of this controversy refuses to be extinguished. in discrediting his research, are the UK medical authorities sure they got it right?
another round of MMR vs Anti-vax, and this time he has the ear of some currently influential Americans. years have passed and yet the fire of this controversy refuses to be extinguished. in discrediting his research, are the UK medical authorities sure they got it right?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by mushroom25. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.// any other "medical professional", by convincing the gullible not to vaccinate their children.//
are we sre that he is a charlatan ?
yes quite sure -
the damage he did lives after him - each measles epidemic there are deaths which are completely avoidable
the real damage to his reputation was not being struck off by the english GMC - but that Horton admitted the Lancet should never have printed the article.
not sure how he got overthat one
are we sre that he is a charlatan ?
yes quite sure -
the damage he did lives after him - each measles epidemic there are deaths which are completely avoidable
the real damage to his reputation was not being struck off by the english GMC - but that Horton admitted the Lancet should never have printed the article.
not sure how he got overthat one
// My own doctor ... did say that if we continued vaccinating against measles it would return with a vengeange in the years to come.//
then he must have missed his vaccy lecture at med school
Measles is returning in the UNvaccinated group
as one wd expect in the suceptible population
what was not anticipated was that public health programmes for the whole group would be later perceived as a matter of choice....
then he must have missed his vaccy lecture at med school
Measles is returning in the UNvaccinated group
as one wd expect in the suceptible population
what was not anticipated was that public health programmes for the whole group would be later perceived as a matter of choice....
we arent talking about whether Measles vacc is 100%
it is whether it occurs in vaccinated children in a more malignant form
No it doesnt
He may have been talking about "modified measles" which occurred in the early seventies after an earlier measles vaccine but this is not seen now. or not
he cd have been talking about the Black Death or Fifth disease or Lupus or .....
God how patients pick up on rubbish and treat it as the gospel truth
it is whether it occurs in vaccinated children in a more malignant form
No it doesnt
He may have been talking about "modified measles" which occurred in the early seventies after an earlier measles vaccine but this is not seen now. or not
he cd have been talking about the Black Death or Fifth disease or Lupus or .....
God how patients pick up on rubbish and treat it as the gospel truth
Can you remember *why* your doctor said what they said, andres?
Also, to the last post, that's kind of how autism works: it's not usually present, noticeably speaking, from the exact moment of birth. What you're observing is essentially a coincidence, and is exactly the same mistake that Wakefield originally made.
Also, to the last post, that's kind of how autism works: it's not usually present, noticeably speaking, from the exact moment of birth. What you're observing is essentially a coincidence, and is exactly the same mistake that Wakefield originally made.
Ah, well, shame you've forgotten why -- I hope you can see that the reason makes a big difference, especially as the two alternatives you've offered are radically different. If the second one, then arguably your doctor predicted the Wakefield effect, etc (ie, people being duped into believing what he was saying while forgetting the dangers of Measles).
On the other hand, if the first, then... I don't understand for a second what he would be trying to say. There's not a shred of credible evidence that vaccines suppress the immune system; indeed, the exact opposite is, by definition true: they enhance the immune system (albeit with the need for a couple of booster jabs later).
See, for example, https:/ /tinyur l.com/y 9scdfqc , which is a review of the evidence (or rather, the lack of it) for links between vaccination programmes and weakened immune systems.
On the other hand, if the first, then... I don't understand for a second what he would be trying to say. There's not a shred of credible evidence that vaccines suppress the immune system; indeed, the exact opposite is, by definition true: they enhance the immune system (albeit with the need for a couple of booster jabs later).
See, for example, https:/
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.