ChatterBank2 mins ago
Baby Swimming
It seems apparent that new born human babies have an inbuilt instinct for swimming.
So why do we therefore have to teach our youngsters to swim a few years later?
And why would a land-dwelling animal have an instinct to swim in the first place?
Thanks.
So why do we therefore have to teach our youngsters to swim a few years later?
And why would a land-dwelling animal have an instinct to swim in the first place?
Thanks.
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by nailit. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ."It seems apparent that new born human babies have an inbuilt instinct for swimming.
So why do we therefore have to teach our youngsters to swim a few years later?"
Because a "few years later" they are no longer "new born" and that instinct has gone.
"And why would a land-dwelling animal have an instinct to swim in the first place? "
it adapts itself to land living but spends it's first nine months in fluid and with "gills" for the first couple of months.
So why do we therefore have to teach our youngsters to swim a few years later?"
Because a "few years later" they are no longer "new born" and that instinct has gone.
"And why would a land-dwelling animal have an instinct to swim in the first place? "
it adapts itself to land living but spends it's first nine months in fluid and with "gills" for the first couple of months.
We will have evolved from aquatic animals. And it's good for survival.
I don't think one has to teach children, it's just that they've learnt to fear and need help overcoming it. Once you know that you breath and could drown, you're less keen on being immersed in water, especially deeper than you're tall.
I don't think one has to teach children, it's just that they've learnt to fear and need help overcoming it. Once you know that you breath and could drown, you're less keen on being immersed in water, especially deeper than you're tall.
Lots of things get developed because ancestors needed them, and there's no intelligent designer demanding they don't form any more. Evolution will randomly change things, but only those changes with survival benefits (long enough to raise kids) stick around. Nothing deliberately clears up that which is no longer needed. It it goes, it goes, if it stays, it stays, if it mutates into something else useful, luck has made it so much the better.