ChatterBank4 mins ago
How Would You Deal With Poverty?
50 Answers
How would you deal with poverty?
Universal Cradit? Evictions? Food banks ? In work poverty? The Underclass?
Universal Cradit? Evictions? Food banks ? In work poverty? The Underclass?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Theland. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Yep. It’s important if you want any answers to be meaningful.
For example, the EU Council of Ministers agreed back in 1985 and according to which the poor are ‘the persons whose resources (material, cultural and social) are so limited as to exclude them from the minimum acceptable way of life in the Member State to which they belong.’
Whilst the World Bank defines poverty as: “as “the inability to attain a minimal standard of living.”
Either of those, or do you have your own definition?
For example, the EU Council of Ministers agreed back in 1985 and according to which the poor are ‘the persons whose resources (material, cultural and social) are so limited as to exclude them from the minimum acceptable way of life in the Member State to which they belong.’
Whilst the World Bank defines poverty as: “as “the inability to attain a minimal standard of living.”
Either of those, or do you have your own definition?
Impossible to answer, one man’s poverty is another’s doing ok, so how do you define poverty - what do you not have that dictates a presence of poverty.
Food has never been more plentiful or cheap compared to percentage of income, clothing ditto, rents are higher than ideal but this is down to demand and too some degree a lack of planning and anticipation of life expectancy. Employment opportunities exist at near record levels, some with flexible hours, some with fixed so the job market is working, so in order to get to a answer as too what is poverty, you need to know what the criteria for measurement of minimum EXPECTATION is, and this is not defined as a expected cash sum but what is required to live on, excluding add on value items such as the latest gadgets, toys, branded clothing, branded footwear as these are not vital and critical for life.
Food has never been more plentiful or cheap compared to percentage of income, clothing ditto, rents are higher than ideal but this is down to demand and too some degree a lack of planning and anticipation of life expectancy. Employment opportunities exist at near record levels, some with flexible hours, some with fixed so the job market is working, so in order to get to a answer as too what is poverty, you need to know what the criteria for measurement of minimum EXPECTATION is, and this is not defined as a expected cash sum but what is required to live on, excluding add on value items such as the latest gadgets, toys, branded clothing, branded footwear as these are not vital and critical for life.
Re Zac's pointing out different definitions, I know of one country in Europe where it has been seriously suggested (I don't know if it is government policy but it is the policy of one part of the social protection/development groupings, it featured in a report called for by a ministry and referred to "severe material deprivation" and described the criteria used for abject poverty) that the characteristics of abject (yes, abject) poverty include amongst others not being able to run a car or have an annual family holiday. Expectations vary widely.
Education and a helping hand when genuinely needed.
Mum was born in Govan, Glasgow in 1913, only girl in a family of 6 kids. Her father died of meningitis when she was 10, she missed school to help launder for the boys and feed them (she more than made up for her education later and pushed her children). By any modern definition they were very, very poor - but she told me defiantly that this was not the case. She had a pair of shoes, poor children didn't. I'm happy to go with this.
Mum was born in Govan, Glasgow in 1913, only girl in a family of 6 kids. Her father died of meningitis when she was 10, she missed school to help launder for the boys and feed them (she more than made up for her education later and pushed her children). By any modern definition they were very, very poor - but she told me defiantly that this was not the case. She had a pair of shoes, poor children didn't. I'm happy to go with this.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.