Quizzes & Puzzles2 mins ago
Labour Intends To Add 20% Vat To Private School Fees ...
... which will put private schooling out of reach of many parents, resulting in an added burden to the already over-crowded classrooms in state schools. Similarly, they say they are against private health care which also alleviates the burden on the State system. Nevertheless, Mr Starmer would rather his loved ones suffer than use it. So the question is when 'going private' means that people take responsibility for themselves it follows that the State has less to cope with, so what's so bad about it?
Answers
No best answer has yet been selected by naomi24. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.https:/
whilst not a U Turn, has the party switched on its turn indicator?
bhg. Vat-free schools are charitable organisations. Surely they could adjust their acceptance policies so as to be a bit charitabl and have a sliding scale. I'm not suggesting that the school should expect richer parents to give to the poorer ones; they should simply explain to prospective parents that they have a sliding scale, and then parents could choose to go elsewhere.
It's bad in the sense that it allows the rich to have the option of a better (if it is better) service that has been deemed a right for all citizens. Managing to attract and extract society's wealth to yourself, or having ancestors who did so, usually allows you to buy luxuries, but it's morally debatable for purchasing necessities.
As I see it private schools & colleges are businesses and so should attract the same taxation as other businesses, not be a special case exempt from it. It will still be the case that only those who can find the money can purchase the service, but that has always been so.
This argument that it'll put a burden on the state schools isn't a good one. Let it. Ensure enough schools are built and running, as the taxpayer is entitled to expect. If some private ones go bust because their business wasn't viable without the tax being waived then that'd put school property on the market for the State to purchase just at the time it needs it.
Maybe 'borrowing' consultants from NHS hospitals to work in private ones a couple of days a week is a bad thing.
The same doctor whose list you can't get on to at your local hospital is miraculously available elsewhere for a few grand over and above your tax and N.I. that you've paid all these years.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.