The Weather Wreaks Havoc In Spain
News8 mins ago
//King Charles has confirmed that it is up to the Australian people to decide whether the country remains a constitutional monarchy or becomes a republic.
Ahead of the King's visit to Australia next week, the Australian Republic Movement exchanged letters with Buckingham Palace officials, writing on the King's behalf.
A referendum on the issue was held in Australia in 1999, where people voted to remain a constitutional monarchy.//
https:/
The quest rumbles on. Should they stay or should they go?
No best answer has yet been selected by naomi24. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Charles attitude is quite right.
I don't think it's a should/shouldn't issue. It a subjective decision as to whether one wants to keep the tradition or separate from an old friend. And a lot would depend on whatever the Australian parliament intended to change as a result. One doesn't want to regret a decision after it's made. (Just compare with our recent General Election.)
Should they stay or should they go? Let them decide
This was a issue in Canada - Pierre Trudeau thought it was a vote catcher to bring "the carnstitootion home!"
HMG, lundy asked - what about the indigenous peoples -(Inuit and Indian that is! we are AB)
and Pierre the great democrat said - what about them?
and Lundy said the agreements were er agreed with the Great White Queen and her successors
and Pierre he thay - yeah us and Lundy said no Elizabeth II
and Pierre the liberator said - "o come arn!"! words !
and Lundy said: tell us what guarantees you are going to put in the new great document of liberty in Otto-waaaaaa
and Pierre said "none silly - plan A is to bring home the carnstitution and abrogate the treaties with the Eskimo and Indians so they have no more rights that the Great Canadian Citizen !
and London said no - no go until you come up with PLan B where the treaties of 1800s are mentioned and preserved
and that was that
I doan know what happened in the end - Pierre the demagogue declared victory and the carnstitootion stayed in London
dunno.
so as ALdex Salmond Found - crossing out " scottish office" and writint in felt tip The Gubmint of Scotland and the Isles - may not be sufficient
It seems that there is another option that they could choose their own monarch.
yup
Aliens Bill in Scortland 170x - voted that the next king of Scotland sould NOT be the king of England unless various guarantees were given
Anne ( Anna the Great) felt obliged to veto that one - one of the last Royal Vetoes - La reyne remercies ses bons sujets et s'avisera - "I will go and seeenk about that one"
and that was the impetus toward political untion
aided by - The Darrien expedition 1697 was a disaster and consumed about 1/3 of the scots GDP. Like you know the GDP was a million before and was now £600k - whoopsie!
oh er and London agreed to pay off the debt
https:/
see also Aliens Act 1705 - London's answer
but we really always knew that didnt we?
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.