Quizzes & Puzzles15 mins ago
You Can't Smoke Here - - Bang Bang You're Dead
https:/ /uk.new s.yahoo .com/wa ffle-ho use-wai tress-s hot-dea d-over- cigaret te-1436 00902.h tml#1MV 1mN
Of course had the waitress been armed, this wouln't have happened (so the NRA thinking goes)
Of course had the waitress been armed, this wouln't have happened (so the NRA thinking goes)
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Canary42. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Yeah, because we all know how well the draconian prohibition of alcohol worked when it was imposed on the population.
A society needs to work out for itself that everyone having a firearm is more perilous and leads to greater tragedies than no one having a firearm.
The problem is getting to the stage where the bad guys are no longer armed. That's a difficult path but steps could be taken if the will was there. There are parallels with the other prohibition but the owning of arms and imbibing on a social beverage are very different matters.
A society needs to work out for itself that everyone having a firearm is more perilous and leads to greater tragedies than no one having a firearm.
The problem is getting to the stage where the bad guys are no longer armed. That's a difficult path but steps could be taken if the will was there. There are parallels with the other prohibition but the owning of arms and imbibing on a social beverage are very different matters.
Gromit " this tragedy was caused by three things. "
1. A violent man
2. Alcohol (or drugs)
3. The availability of firearms.
"Blaming just guns is kind of missing the problem."
Wrong! The shooting would not have happened if the drunk violent man had not had access to a firearm
It could just as easily have been perpetrated by a sane and sober ( but peed off) man with a gun
gun being the common denominator here.
1. A violent man
2. Alcohol (or drugs)
3. The availability of firearms.
"Blaming just guns is kind of missing the problem."
Wrong! The shooting would not have happened if the drunk violent man had not had access to a firearm
It could just as easily have been perpetrated by a sane and sober ( but peed off) man with a gun
gun being the common denominator here.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.