News8 mins ago
Finally A Senior Police Officer With Some Common Sense.
If only more forces would follow this senior police officer.
https:/ /news.s ky.com/ story/s enior-p olice-o fficer- investi gate-bu rglarie s-and-v iolent- crime-n ot-miso gyny-11 541512
https:/ /www.da ilymail .co.uk/ news/ar ticle-6 337863/ Police- focus-b urglari es-viol ence-in stead-n on-crim es-says -chief. html
https:/
https:/
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by webbo3. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.^^^I don't think jno was being ironic - I think he was trying, and failing, to make a feeble point that if you don't investigate wolf whistling why bother investigating other crimes against women - although wolf whistling isn't a crime.
The stories in the link below are all about offense being taken, and it seems to me that offense is taken far too easily nowadays, but not only is it taken, people now make a song and dance about it, stamp their feet, and expect action.
https:/ /www.da ilymail .co.uk/ news/ar ticle-6 343943/ Police- forced- spend-h ours-in vestiga ting-11 -236-ha te-crim es-vega n-bully ing.htm l
I'm going to exaggerate to make a point (before some people take it literally - as no doubt some people would), but surely it stands to reason that if wasting police time on some hairy-arsed builder wolf whistling a pretty girl means the little old lady getting bumped on the head and her pension nicked isn't investigated properly, that the former (non-crime) should be ignored?
The police only have a finite amount of money - and always have - and therefore 'crimes' such as wolf whistling should be ignored and the resources spent elsewhere.
The stories in the link below are all about offense being taken, and it seems to me that offense is taken far too easily nowadays, but not only is it taken, people now make a song and dance about it, stamp their feet, and expect action.
https:/
I'm going to exaggerate to make a point (before some people take it literally - as no doubt some people would), but surely it stands to reason that if wasting police time on some hairy-arsed builder wolf whistling a pretty girl means the little old lady getting bumped on the head and her pension nicked isn't investigated properly, that the former (non-crime) should be ignored?
The police only have a finite amount of money - and always have - and therefore 'crimes' such as wolf whistling should be ignored and the resources spent elsewhere.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.