Donate SIGN UP

Copleston And Russell

Avatar Image
Atheist | 12:37 Wed 04th Mar 2020 | Religion & Spirituality
2 Answers
You need not read the whole debate to appreciate the civilised, polite and rational approach to having a 'disagreement'. Almost up to AB standard!
https://philosophydungeon.weebly.com/argument-from-contingency.html#
Gravatar

Answers

1 to 2 of 2rss feed

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by Atheist. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
Read what seemed a lot of it, then gave up. Most seems to be gibberish. One needs no reason for existence in the sense something or someone has an predetermined aim for everything, so there is no compelling reason to think that a need for a deity has been proven. Things could well, just be.

(Not the sort of thing you start to read and can't put down. More the sort if thing you wonder why you're reading, put it down, then don't seem to pick it up again.)
Very civilised.

1 to 2 of 2rss feed

Do you know the answer?

Copleston And Russell

Answer Question >>

Related Questions

Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.