Crosswords1 min ago
Immigration --> More Building, More Locally-Farmed Food
4 Answers
With more building, seemingly on green-field sites that we need to feed more of the population, and net migration >> zero, UK Ltd really ought to take steps to save our farming land and limit building to brown-field sites.
(So-called developers are very happy to grab open fields, there being little or no ground-pollution to deal with.)
Sooner rather than later, we will be forced to rely on home-produced foods, rather than import such products for which competition from the steadily-increasing world population will intensify.
.
A suggestion to ease pressure on growing foods is to use more inner-city sites. Roofs and 'cascading green facades' would bring a two-fold benefit: localised foods and cooling buildings in the Summer.
Any other ideas?
(So-called developers are very happy to grab open fields, there being little or no ground-pollution to deal with.)
Sooner rather than later, we will be forced to rely on home-produced foods, rather than import such products for which competition from the steadily-increasing world population will intensify.
.
A suggestion to ease pressure on growing foods is to use more inner-city sites. Roofs and 'cascading green facades' would bring a two-fold benefit: localised foods and cooling buildings in the Summer.
Any other ideas?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by gl556tr. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.I've never seen the logic of labelling an area a green site if the intent is to build on it. Seems it's only done to a) try and con the public, and b) push the price up. If something is worth saving from building on; then designate it "green" and keep it like that.
As for the immigration/building/farming bit. Unsure what the point was. We should grow crops as needed where appropriate, and limit immigration as much as possible as any net increase in our population is exasperating a situation, not solving it.
As for the immigration/building/farming bit. Unsure what the point was. We should grow crops as needed where appropriate, and limit immigration as much as possible as any net increase in our population is exasperating a situation, not solving it.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.