Quizzes & Puzzles4 mins ago
What was the first civilization on Earth?
Which civilization was established first in the world?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by rcb49. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
-- answer removed --
Such a question tends to lead to arguments! See here:
http://www.blurtit.com/q600671.html
As is pointed out on that thread, all trace of early civilizations may have been lost. There is no reason to believe that the earliest humans, from whom we're all descended, didn't start banding together and sharing social values in Africa 50,000 years ago. (Does that qualify as 'civilization'?).
Chris
http://www.blurtit.com/q600671.html
As is pointed out on that thread, all trace of early civilizations may have been lost. There is no reason to believe that the earliest humans, from whom we're all descended, didn't start banding together and sharing social values in Africa 50,000 years ago. (Does that qualify as 'civilization'?).
Chris
Chris is pointing in the right direction here. As with many areas of study, knowledge and understanding of archaeology has shifted in the last couple of generations. It is now generally accepted that the more easily (!) excavated evidence of large settlements is only one part of a much longer process. Many intersting and intriguing discoveries have been made for example at Gobekli Tepe in southern Turkey that point to the things we associate with 'civilisation' - organised religion, trade, making permanent buildings - happening around 9000 BC.
This is at least doubles the previously-held 'start' date of c3500 BC, which is when 'fully formed' towns start to be seen in the Nile Vally, Iraq, and the Indus Valley.
You have to bear in mind that needle in haystack doesn't begin to describe the randomness of field research - which is very dependent on funding and safety ie most archaeology does not take place in war zones.
However, I cannot accept wild claims that star-being and atlanteans had any role in the process, mainly because the evidence for these claims crumbles away when it is interrogated. Real evidence can be weighed, measured, photographed, discussed and re-evaluated, and from that conclusions can be reached and modified.
This is at least doubles the previously-held 'start' date of c3500 BC, which is when 'fully formed' towns start to be seen in the Nile Vally, Iraq, and the Indus Valley.
You have to bear in mind that needle in haystack doesn't begin to describe the randomness of field research - which is very dependent on funding and safety ie most archaeology does not take place in war zones.
However, I cannot accept wild claims that star-being and atlanteans had any role in the process, mainly because the evidence for these claims crumbles away when it is interrogated. Real evidence can be weighed, measured, photographed, discussed and re-evaluated, and from that conclusions can be reached and modified.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.