ChatterBank3 mins ago
1911 Look Up Please
I am looking for Oliver R Hindmarsh born Dudley 1907 - can you see him on the 1911 census? Who is he with and where etc please?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by echokilo. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.hi. not spotted him as that name on the 1911 index on ancestry, certainly not in birmingham birn 1907, there's an Oliver Hindmarch born @1902 on the 1911 living in yorkshire though born worcester
1911 England Census 1911 England Census
Name: Oliver Hindmarsh
Age in 1911: 9
Estimated Birth Year: abt 1902
Relation to Head: Son
Gender: Male
Birth Place: Netherton, Worcester, England
Civil parish: Royston
County/Island: Yorkshire-West Riding
Country: England
Street Address: Whincover Royston Barnsly Yorks
Marital Status: Single
Occupation: School
Registration district: Barnsley
Registration District Number: 507
Sub-registration district: Darton
ED, institution, or vessel: 05
Piece: 27549
Household Members: Name Age
James Hindmarsh 33
Hannah Hindmarsh 35
Oliver Hindmarsh 9
James Hindmarsh 5
Cornelius Hindmarsh 3
Gladys Hindmarsh 1
Wellie Hindmarsh Under 1/12
Source Citation: Class: RG14; Piece: 27549; ; .
I'll just look at the original to see if there is a transcription error on the age
1911 England Census 1911 England Census
Name: Oliver Hindmarsh
Age in 1911: 9
Estimated Birth Year: abt 1902
Relation to Head: Son
Gender: Male
Birth Place: Netherton, Worcester, England
Civil parish: Royston
County/Island: Yorkshire-West Riding
Country: England
Street Address: Whincover Royston Barnsly Yorks
Marital Status: Single
Occupation: School
Registration district: Barnsley
Registration District Number: 507
Sub-registration district: Darton
ED, institution, or vessel: 05
Piece: 27549
Household Members: Name Age
James Hindmarsh 33
Hannah Hindmarsh 35
Oliver Hindmarsh 9
James Hindmarsh 5
Cornelius Hindmarsh 3
Gladys Hindmarsh 1
Wellie Hindmarsh Under 1/12
Source Citation: Class: RG14; Piece: 27549; ; .
I'll just look at the original to see if there is a transcription error on the age
As I do some transcribing from parish registers, I can tell you Dot that there was some fairly flamboyant writing around then! I can't imagine Nellie becoming Wellie, though the N is often written with a flourish.
The other problem is that a lot of the transcriptions are done in the US and there is the lack of local knowledge where place names are concerned., hence some glaring errors can occur.
The other problem is that a lot of the transcriptions are done in the US and there is the lack of local knowledge where place names are concerned., hence some glaring errors can occur.
I agree zebo, but mis- transcribing nellie as wellie for a girl's first name is ridiculous, I gave up sending ancestry corrections a while ago as it was so time consuming. several years ago you could get credits on FMP for sending corrections but they may have stopped that now.
The only hidmarsh i've found in dudley around 1902ish is a John Henry Q4 1901.
The only hidmarsh i've found in dudley around 1902ish is a John Henry Q4 1901.
It's funny that dotty 'cos I have your Oliver living with his uncle in 1911.....
YOUNG, Noah Head Married 11 years M 30 1881 Publican Licensed Victualler Woodside Dudley
YOUNG, Ann Wife Married F 31 1880 Quarry Bank Worc
YOUNG, Voilet Daughter Single F 9 1902 Holly Hall Dudley
YOUNG, Ivy Daughter F 7 1904 Woodside Dudley
HINDMARSH, Oliver Nephew M 9 1902 Netherton Dudley Worc
YOUNG, Noah Head Married 11 years M 30 1881 Publican Licensed Victualler Woodside Dudley
YOUNG, Ann Wife Married F 31 1880 Quarry Bank Worc
YOUNG, Voilet Daughter Single F 9 1902 Holly Hall Dudley
YOUNG, Ivy Daughter F 7 1904 Woodside Dudley
HINDMARSH, Oliver Nephew M 9 1902 Netherton Dudley Worc
I think for the 1911 return it would be quite understandable for a parent to add a child who was temporarily away from home particularly as one of the questions related to all children living or dead from the head of household. so, which is it that EK is after? either the 1902 or the 1907 will get back to a shared paternal ancestor anyway I guess.
Thanks to you both - seems I started quite a bit of a debate!! I think it's the 1907 brn one I need - at Old Hill in 1911 (if he actually WAS there on the night of the census!!) Thanks so much for your help - is there anywhere I can view the 1911 in full free of charge yet? I need to ask for another look up but will start another thread (in case the Ed gets cross with me!!) xx