Quizzes & Puzzles5 mins ago
What a great love story ..
Easy I suppose to dismiss the implications of his decision. I have just watched an interpretation of their story. Leaves me wanting to know more, I will have to read up on them both! http://www.youtube.co...st=PL20BAB523C641D64D
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Quassia. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.I heard a version on the radio a few weeks back - it gave me better insight into the fact that he gave up the throne for love, rather than setting his lover aside. He's been called selfish and unpatriotic, but nowadays it probably wouldn't seem so awful. Princess Margaret couldn't marry Townsend as he was a divorcé, but Charles has married Camilla. Times change.
I was watching a programme about Royal Weddings last week - it said that Edward only seem to be attracted to married women and only dated married women. He was a bit of a playboy and went against tradition and what was expected of him.
Even if he had not met Mrs. Simpson, I think he would not have married to fit in with what was tradition.
Even if he had not met Mrs. Simpson, I think he would not have married to fit in with what was tradition.
A love story of sorts, but he must have known that Wallace Simpson would not be acceptable as Queen consort. This was 1937 she was a divorced commoner and American at that, and unable to bear children (no heir to the throne). At least Edward was counselled wisely and he gave up the throne honestly. Not like Charles who is selfish and greedy having is cake and still wanting more, he's got away with it, having his heir and spare and then marrying his concubine.