Quizzes & Puzzles7 mins ago
Birth And Death Date Confusion
There's something that is baffling me about birth and death dates. I am most likely being very stupid, but here's what I'm not understanding:
Someone born in 1960 and lives for thirty years has the dates 1960 - 1990
No problem with that!
But in reading about philosophers, it seems to me that they are dying before they are born! E.g,
Socrates 470 - 399 BCE
Plato 427 - 349
Aristotle 384 - 322
What is happening here? Why is 399 BCE later than 470 BCE etc?
Someone born in 1960 and lives for thirty years has the dates 1960 - 1990
No problem with that!
But in reading about philosophers, it seems to me that they are dying before they are born! E.g,
Socrates 470 - 399 BCE
Plato 427 - 349
Aristotle 384 - 322
What is happening here? Why is 399 BCE later than 470 BCE etc?
Answers
The reason is that bce dates go backwards - for example 470bce is 470 years before christian era while 399 bce is only 399 years before christian era
15:55 Wed 12th Aug 2015
@fiction-factory
Is it 4000? I can't remember. Whatever young-earth creationists claim it is.
Ah. I've just scrolled sideways, to look at the side column (I'm viewing on a phone) and realised this is not in the section I thought it was in.
I must admit I wondered what BCE was, the first time I came across it. Expected something technical (it was a science forum, discussing evolution, geological evidence and so on). Why add a redundant extra letter to a perfectly well understood acronym? Political correctness? No-one had heard of it back then.
I'm not surprised it was the J-witnesses who dreamt it up. Creationists regularly butted in to disrupt the, otherwise entertaining, scientific debates and it's easy to just lump them all together.
Is it 4000? I can't remember. Whatever young-earth creationists claim it is.
Ah. I've just scrolled sideways, to look at the side column (I'm viewing on a phone) and realised this is not in the section I thought it was in.
I must admit I wondered what BCE was, the first time I came across it. Expected something technical (it was a science forum, discussing evolution, geological evidence and so on). Why add a redundant extra letter to a perfectly well understood acronym? Political correctness? No-one had heard of it back then.
I'm not surprised it was the J-witnesses who dreamt it up. Creationists regularly butted in to disrupt the, otherwise entertaining, scientific debates and it's easy to just lump them all together.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.