King Arthur Would Have Been Nice.

[Canary42]

With the four of his current names to choose from (Charles Philip Arthur George,) His Majesty could have chosen Arthur presumably.

It would be nice to have another King Arthur with a Round Table of Knights :-)

[jno]

nice thought but ... Pleasant as it is, Highgrove isn't quite Camelot.

[Canary42]

///Highgrove isn't quite Camelot.///

And Camilla's no Guinivere ;-)

[jno]

ah, I don't think he'd fancy all those knights charging through his groves of Duchy Original Biscuit trees

https://youtu.be/0JNlOTccdck

[gness]

Which Sirs would you want around the table, Canary?

[wolf63]

King Arthur is a strong-sounding name.

Charles is not King Arthur Material!

[Canary42]

Not sure gness, my knowledge of the Round Table is very rusty (after all it over 70 years since I lapped up Malory's tales (children's version).

I guess Sir Lancelot would have to be there.

[gness]

Well if an honorary counts….not that I approved….I’ll kick off with Geldof just for the hell of it. ;-)

[Buenchico]

Gness would have . . .
Sir Tificate-for-dancing
Sir Upticiously-drinking
Sir Tainly-not-sober
and Sir Rounded-by-Drunks

[THECORBYLOON]

Sir Christopher Braker or "Kit" to his pals...

[David H]

We nearly had a King Arthur had Henry VIIIs older brother had survived long enough to be king. My choice for this one was King Philip after his father who deserves to be honoured for a future king.

[gness]

You talking about me and Caran again, Chris? ;-)

[jno]

We might have been better off with Henry IX than Charles I as well, David H.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Henry_Frederick,_Prince_of_Wales

Surprisingly few English monarchs seem to have been originally destined for the throne; a lot of prematurely dead heirs along the way.