Recession Risk As Britain Reels From...
News1 min ago
No best answer has yet been selected by stef001. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Not sure exactly what you're driving at, but here goes:
It is known that Zulu warriors disemboweled many of the dead British soldiers. It was seen as barbarism by many but is the Zulu way of releasing the body's spirit after death. Also, prior to battle, the Zulus were given an intoxicating concoction which gave them feelings of euphoria, similar to an opiate.
The Martini-Henry rifle used by the British produced a lot of smoke resulting in a build up of carbon deposits. This was thought to be a major factor as the troops were having difficulty reloading, allowing the Zulus to advance on their position at a much greater pace.
Other than that I can't really tell you much more. Hope that helps.
If you're really interested in this stef, then the link below may help. It's to the Military Museum site in Brecon where they have a large exhibit dedicated to the Zulu battles that the Welsh Regiment fought in. If you e-mail them your questions, they may be able to provide you with a more comprehensive answer.
Museum's worth a visit too.
The conventional wisdom for over a hundred years was that the British were in control of the battle and had the Zulus pinned down with volleys from the Martini Henrys. The ammunition ran out because they couldn't get the boxes open quickly enough, possibly because the heat had caused the screws to oxidise. Once the volleys had reduced the Zulus took their chance and broke the line.
Recent research, mainly by the Zulu historian Ian Knight, have suggested, as mentioned above, that the boxes could be opened with a forceful dunt from a rifle butt, putting the lack of ammunition theory in some doubt. Despite other factors, such as the Zulus being on performance-enhancing drugs, the reason for the massacre is probably very simple. For the British Army to beat off an attack by a much larger force, it was necessary to maintain a steady rate of volley fire, either from a square or in two unbroken lines firing alternately. The officer in charge, Pulleine, underestimated the force and resolve of the Zulus, and spread his men too thinly. Some of the companies were a mile out from the camp base, which may well have caused some of the ammunition problems. The Zulus were able to overwhelm each pocket of soldiers before moving on, and once they got in amongst the British it was all over.
It was believed that Lord Chelmsford's faulty reconnaisance allowed the 20,000 strong Zulu army to remain undetected until it burst upon an unprepared camp in a pincer movement and took them by surprise.
The British started the battle with only 40 - 50 cartridges each but when the battle became intense they needed more ammunition... regulations would not allow them to open more than one box at a time, as every cartridge had to be accounted for. As the screws were rusted they hacked at them with axes and bayonets, till Lt Smith-Dorrien forced one open and began shovelling cartidges into the men's helmets only for one of the regimental quarter-masters to tell hin to stop - as he didn't have the correct requisition papers......
Another interesting fact is that because of the appalling atrocities by the Zulus this was the last battle that Bugle Boys were ever used.
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.