Businesses Warn Of Job Losses Threat As...
News1 min ago
Serial Killers
16 Answers
I was watching a film last night about a serial killer. This chap had killed 200 women before being caught. This got me to thinking about him and other infamous serial killers and how they managed to obtain serial killer status, i.e. mamaging to kill lots of people, before being caught out.
Obviously, there is something very wrong with these people, some sort of antisocial behavioural disorder or whatever, but to be able to manage to evade the police for sometimes many years, do these people have an above average IQ or were they just cunning?
Obviously, there is something very wrong with these people, some sort of antisocial behavioural disorder or whatever, but to be able to manage to evade the police for sometimes many years, do these people have an above average IQ or were they just cunning?
Answers
1 to 16 of 16
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by {Dakota}. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
I think it boils down to MOST victims of serial killers are in one way or another out of the social system.
Shipman old fogies
Yorkshire Ripper old toms
Neilson homeless rent boys
The Wests abandoned children (and there own)
Steve Wright old toms
The victims may have many enemies or sadly not be missed. This gives the murderer time to get his story straight and move on to the next victim.
I don't think they have an extra IQ than joe average.
But if I was mad (which they ALL are) how hard is it to simply kill somebody and move on? My DNA and fingerprints are not logged with the police. Even if caught on CCTV, I can cut my hair, grow a beard and as said the cops do not know me.
As as for changing the number plate on, say a grey Ford Focus, is hardly rocket science to evade capture.
Shipman old fogies
Yorkshire Ripper old toms
Neilson homeless rent boys
The Wests abandoned children (and there own)
Steve Wright old toms
The victims may have many enemies or sadly not be missed. This gives the murderer time to get his story straight and move on to the next victim.
I don't think they have an extra IQ than joe average.
But if I was mad (which they ALL are) how hard is it to simply kill somebody and move on? My DNA and fingerprints are not logged with the police. Even if caught on CCTV, I can cut my hair, grow a beard and as said the cops do not know me.
As as for changing the number plate on, say a grey Ford Focus, is hardly rocket science to evade capture.
Well you would have to be mad first and foremost, but basically yes.
Killing somebody isn't that hard is it, if there is an element of surprise.
Fair enough if you and I were fighting, even with weopans, it will be fairly tough for you to actually take my life. But if you drugged me first, or approached from behind with a saucepan. Bish bash bosh over my head, I am a gonna.
How many serial killers apart from that weirdo in America a few years back kill with guns?? I can't think of one.
Thomas Hamilton and Michael Ryan are notreally serial killers as their victims were all in one sitting as such.
Killing somebody isn't that hard is it, if there is an element of surprise.
Fair enough if you and I were fighting, even with weopans, it will be fairly tough for you to actually take my life. But if you drugged me first, or approached from behind with a saucepan. Bish bash bosh over my head, I am a gonna.
How many serial killers apart from that weirdo in America a few years back kill with guns?? I can't think of one.
Thomas Hamilton and Michael Ryan are notreally serial killers as their victims were all in one sitting as such.
You would need to hope though Dakota that you never get caught for an offence in future or your DNA / finger print would come up as a match in future.
Also, having read a lot of John Douglas books, it seems that the serial killer types tend to come across as your general Ned Flanders type friendly neighbour so nobody would suspect them. It seems rare that the serial killers are as you would expect them to be, in the same way that sex offenders are rarely smelly old men wearing rain coats.
Also, having read a lot of John Douglas books, it seems that the serial killer types tend to come across as your general Ned Flanders type friendly neighbour so nobody would suspect them. It seems rare that the serial killers are as you would expect them to be, in the same way that sex offenders are rarely smelly old men wearing rain coats.
Ian Brady has said - and he is qualified to know - that if you murder someone to whom you are connected, and the vast majority of murders are commited by someone known to the victim, then the chances are you will get caught. Murder a complete stranger, and the chances are you wil get away with it.
History does seem to add weight to this argument - Nielsen was only caught because he had a 'backlog' of bodies - he was unconnected to his victims, some of whom remain unidentified to this day.
It appears that killing at random by someone with no police record stands an excellent chance of remaining undetected - what a chilling thought.
History does seem to add weight to this argument - Nielsen was only caught because he had a 'backlog' of bodies - he was unconnected to his victims, some of whom remain unidentified to this day.
It appears that killing at random by someone with no police record stands an excellent chance of remaining undetected - what a chilling thought.
and the ripper was caught because of a motoring offence.
This is my favourite subject.
Its totally fascinating
i think now we have DNA, serial killers are really not going to be as prevellant as they were at one time. Like the Ipswich murders, they arent out there for long. They kill randomly and this will always lead to a mistake along the way.
.I have read some really interesting stuff over the years about more or less all of them.. The Blooding is a great book about Colin Pitchfork and how he tried to evade DNA testing which was the first time it was ever used to catch a killer. Well worth a read if you get hold of it.
This is my favourite subject.
Its totally fascinating
i think now we have DNA, serial killers are really not going to be as prevellant as they were at one time. Like the Ipswich murders, they arent out there for long. They kill randomly and this will always lead to a mistake along the way.
.I have read some really interesting stuff over the years about more or less all of them.. The Blooding is a great book about Colin Pitchfork and how he tried to evade DNA testing which was the first time it was ever used to catch a killer. Well worth a read if you get hold of it.
The subject of serial killers fascinates me too, but I could never recall any instance where I'd read if the killer in question was more intelligent than the average.
I've read quite a few books on the subject too, though I'm more into the story of the killer, how they killed their victims etc and how they were caught in the end etc.
One of my favourite stories is called 'The Girl in the Box', which isn't actually about a serial killer, but about a chap and his wife who kidnap a hitchiker girl in the 70's and keep her in a coffin like box under their bed for years. She was allowed out for an hour or so a day until eventually she had been brainwashed by them to such an extent that she was free to do what she wanted (go to the shop etc.), yet she didn't make a run for it. I can't imagine ever being in a situation where I would be brainwashed like that, but you never know.
I've read quite a few books on the subject too, though I'm more into the story of the killer, how they killed their victims etc and how they were caught in the end etc.
One of my favourite stories is called 'The Girl in the Box', which isn't actually about a serial killer, but about a chap and his wife who kidnap a hitchiker girl in the 70's and keep her in a coffin like box under their bed for years. She was allowed out for an hour or so a day until eventually she had been brainwashed by them to such an extent that she was free to do what she wanted (go to the shop etc.), yet she didn't make a run for it. I can't imagine ever being in a situation where I would be brainwashed like that, but you never know.
As said earlier you have to be mad to be a serial killer. sanity will just not work. It can be summed up nicely in "Hannibal" in a converstaion betwen Will Grahan (Ed Norton) and Hannibal Lecter.
Will Graham: I thought you might enjoy the challenge. Find out if you're smarter than the person I'm looking for.
Hannibal Lecter: Then, by implication, you think you're smarter than I am, since it was you who caught me.
Will Graham: No, I know I'm not smarter than you.
Hannibal Lecter: Then how did you catch me?
Will Graham: You had... disadvantages.
Hannibal Lecter: What disadvantages?
Will Graham: You're insane.
Will Graham: I thought you might enjoy the challenge. Find out if you're smarter than the person I'm looking for.
Hannibal Lecter: Then, by implication, you think you're smarter than I am, since it was you who caught me.
Will Graham: No, I know I'm not smarter than you.
Hannibal Lecter: Then how did you catch me?
Will Graham: You had... disadvantages.
Hannibal Lecter: What disadvantages?
Will Graham: You're insane.
1 to 16 of 16
Latest Posts
Crosswords13 mins ago
News14 mins ago
Power Of Social Media Put To Good Use
News15 mins ago
Starmer Continues With "Grossly...
News18 mins ago
