Technology1 min ago
Bulding empires?
2 Answers
This question has a few different sections:
1.Who do you think was the best at it?(a person/ people)
2.Was Ghengis Khan's that hard to build?
3.Is there any not well known, but still impressive, empires.
and 4. How come there's no proper ones anymore. I mean when America conquered/defeated Iraq they didn't take there land, it's still called Iraq (Not that I'm complaining). tnx
1.Who do you think was the best at it?(a person/ people)
2.Was Ghengis Khan's that hard to build?
3.Is there any not well known, but still impressive, empires.
and 4. How come there's no proper ones anymore. I mean when America conquered/defeated Iraq they didn't take there land, it's still called Iraq (Not that I'm complaining). tnx
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by crazy legs. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.1) John Moores
2) He didnlt build anything he just killed thousands and stole countries
3) the mayan empire is not necessarily well known, not like the Egyptians or Romans, but just as inpressive though not as intellectual
4) Modern Empires are still about wealth and power, and there are many, Richard Branson has one for instance
2) He didnlt build anything he just killed thousands and stole countries
3) the mayan empire is not necessarily well known, not like the Egyptians or Romans, but just as inpressive though not as intellectual
4) Modern Empires are still about wealth and power, and there are many, Richard Branson has one for instance
empires are often about gaining access to resources. So America doesn't need to take Iraqi land, it just needs to get a pro-US government installed that will agree to sell cheap oil to the USA. I forget how many countries the Americans have military bases in - about 130, I think - so that gives them plenty of opportunity to lean on foreign governments without the bother of going to war with them. Britain's eagerness to follow the USA into Iraq is a case in point. Why should they risk more American lives than they have to when they can risk British ones instead?
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.