ChatterBank5 mins ago
Edwardian Weddings
I am writing a novel and i was wondering what an upper class wedding in 1911 would be like. would it be very different from nowdays? The bride and groom in this novel are 17 and she is three months preganant (the reason that they are marrying), would this make any differenece. i.e done quickly and less formal, what do you all think.
Answers
1 to 5 of 5
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Annanan. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
The practice in the upper classes was to marry very quickly after announcing engagements - so a pregnancy was often passed off as an 'early' baby in all classes. Plus the wealthy might return from an extended honeymoon with a baby born at an unannounced date abroad.
Wedding dresses tended to be 'best dresses', but depending on your social position it was considered dangerous to be 'too fashionable'. So by 1911 designers like Leon Bakst were cutting edge and some rich women would wear these kind of designs, but most would still be in the styles of the Edwardian era. Since the best frock of a rich womn was often white, it gradully became the case later in the 20th century that women wore white dresses to get married.
A 17-year old male would only be considered marriage fodder if there was summat up ie ill - most men were older than their brides.
On the other hand a 17 yr old female was a great catch if from a rich family.
Wedding dresses tended to be 'best dresses', but depending on your social position it was considered dangerous to be 'too fashionable'. So by 1911 designers like Leon Bakst were cutting edge and some rich women would wear these kind of designs, but most would still be in the styles of the Edwardian era. Since the best frock of a rich womn was often white, it gradully became the case later in the 20th century that women wore white dresses to get married.
A 17-year old male would only be considered marriage fodder if there was summat up ie ill - most men were older than their brides.
On the other hand a 17 yr old female was a great catch if from a rich family.
-- answer removed --
-- answer removed --
An extraordinary outpouring of vitriol seems to have been prompted by an innocent question. Steve wants to have a rant about dual standards and Marie Stopes (who was a eugenicist incidentally). Noknowledge never makes a typo or has skippy key syndrome so must punish the poster for doing so.
Poster asked about an effing wedding frock for godsake.
Poster asked about an effing wedding frock for godsake.
1 to 5 of 5
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.