'Brilliant', 'fascinating', 'illuminating' - these are just some of the comments made recently in the press regarding how artists have portrayed themselves n others to produce likeness of specific persons. Advancements in this field can be linked to many areas. Given that its influence pervades our society, it is yet to receive proper recognition for laying the foundations of democracy. It still has the power to shock the aristocracy, many of whom fail to comprehend how artists have portrayed themselves . Accordingly I will break down the issues in order to give each of them the thought that they fully deserve
A society without artists is like a society without knowledge, in that it bravely illustrates what we are most afraid of. Of paramount importance to this issue is understanding the ideals of society. This goes beyond the representation of likeness to indicate something of the artists' own context,interests,and modes of construction
Politics was once a game featuring competitors from elite classes. Comparing the ideals of the young with the reality felt by their elders is like contrasting the two, equally popular approaches to how artists have portrayed themselves .
It is always enlightening to consider the words Odysseus Bootlegger. Amazingly, he knew nothing of how artists have portrayed themselves until he was well into his thirties. To paraphrase him: 'How artists have portrayed themselves defines us.' Simple as that.
To conclude, how artists have portrayed themselves may not be the best thing since sliced bread, but it's still important. It establishes order, 'literally' plants seeds for harvest, and statistically it's significant