News10 mins ago
What Does 'lawful Living Right' Mean?
We have come across a property for sale privately with land and a barn which has stables underneath and living accommodation above. In the description it states the barn has 'lawful living right' but is not a 'Barn Conversion'. I've emailed the owners for clarification but they are being shifty about the whole thing and a Google search of the term reveals nothing. The only thing they have said is its not eligible for Council Tax. Its a long way to go to visit and I just wondered if there was anyone who has come across this Term and what it means? Thanks
Answers
No guys, you are missing one of the key points. Planning policies in most parts of the country (not sure about National Parks) allow for an additional dwelling to be permitted for a person who derives his income from agriculture or forestry. That, as well as the business about using sustainable materials, seems to be the deal here. Twenty acres is enough to...
17:30 Thu 24th Jul 2014
Disclaimer: I most definitely don't KNOW the answer here. I'm simply trying to SUGGEST what it MIGHT mean!
Under the Planning and Compensation Act 1991, local authorities can't take action for a breach of planning rules if a property has been used as a single dwelling house for more than 4 years without any such action being commenced.
So I'm guessing that the property owners are saying that it's not got planning permission but, because someone has lived there for more than 4 years already (without the local authority taking action for a breach of planning laws) there's now no need for planning permission anyway. (i.e. you can legally live in it without fear of problems from the Planning Inspectorate).
Under the Planning and Compensation Act 1991, local authorities can't take action for a breach of planning rules if a property has been used as a single dwelling house for more than 4 years without any such action being commenced.
So I'm guessing that the property owners are saying that it's not got planning permission but, because someone has lived there for more than 4 years already (without the local authority taking action for a breach of planning laws) there's now no need for planning permission anyway. (i.e. you can legally live in it without fear of problems from the Planning Inspectorate).
-- answer removed --
builders mate thankyou for the reply. This is not being marketed as a Barn for conversion, its actually 14 acres of land with a barn on it with 'lawful living right'. its priced at £300,000 which is pretty hefty for 14 acre of ag. land with a barn with no planning permission in Lincolnshire. i shall email them as you suggested and mention the certificate of lawfulness.
Ah, I see. I thought there was a property with land, and IN ADDITION, a barn which they are claiming has been occupied for more than four years. 14 acres of agricultural land is worth no more than £200k. You simply cannot assume that getting consent will be straightforward as planners hate extra dwellings being created in open countryside by these sort of surreptitious methods. Since the vendor is the one suggesting it may be possible to live in it, who isn't he regularising the planning status prior to sale.
Has the existing vendor been living in this property and deriving a living by working this land? If he has, any attempt to regularise the planning, May result in an agricultural tie being a condition placed. Perhaps that's OK with you but dwellings with agricultural ties cannot easily be removed, and they are worth less on the market.
Has the existing vendor been living in this property and deriving a living by working this land? If he has, any attempt to regularise the planning, May result in an agricultural tie being a condition placed. Perhaps that's OK with you but dwellings with agricultural ties cannot easily be removed, and they are worth less on the market.
hi builders mate. The back story is the Vendors are selling off part of their land with this barn and creating a new Title. The barn has been used for horse stables with a groom living in the accommodation above the stables. The Vendors live in an adjacent property. On reflection, and from what you have said, I can't understand why they have not gone down the planning permission route themselves as it would add a considerable amount of money onto the value. As it is we are steering well clear of this property but thanks for the really useful info it really is a minefield this PP larky.
It is this one:
http:// www.ind ependen t.co.uk /news/u k/home- news/re prieve- for-dev on-eco- home-bu ilt-wit hout-pl anning- permiss ion-962 4696.ht ml
yeah yeah I know Independent, which comes up if you goggle " D T planning permission
My eyes bulged as I thought - 'I couldnt do that ! '
http://
yeah yeah I know Independent, which comes up if you goggle " D T planning permission
My eyes bulged as I thought - 'I couldnt do that ! '
No guys, you are missing one of the key points.
Planning policies in most parts of the country (not sure about National Parks) allow for an additional dwelling to be permitted for a person who derives his income from agriculture or forestry. That, as well as the business about using sustainable materials, seems to be the deal here. Twenty acres is enough to demonstrate a viable smallholding. That was the point of my second reply.
If this groom's full-time job is only looking after the horse, that sounds like accommodation with an agricultural tie to me. And that is what the owners would more easily get, in terms of consent.
And, in turn, that is why are attempting to sale it with hope value, to an unsuspecting punter who doesn't understand these things.
Investment in large bargepole is recommended.
Planning policies in most parts of the country (not sure about National Parks) allow for an additional dwelling to be permitted for a person who derives his income from agriculture or forestry. That, as well as the business about using sustainable materials, seems to be the deal here. Twenty acres is enough to demonstrate a viable smallholding. That was the point of my second reply.
If this groom's full-time job is only looking after the horse, that sounds like accommodation with an agricultural tie to me. And that is what the owners would more easily get, in terms of consent.
And, in turn, that is why are attempting to sale it with hope value, to an unsuspecting punter who doesn't understand these things.
Investment in large bargepole is recommended.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.