News1 min ago
Social housing
73 Answers
Social housing should be reserved for people on low incomes; it is unfair for people with a high income to occupy social housing when people on a low income are forced to rent privately. I know incomes can reduce as well as increase but would it not be fairer when the joint income reaches, say twice the average income, to be given notice to leave so that a low-income family can occupy social housing. If circumstances reduce income the original family can re-apply for social housing.
I know this will produce some anomalies but would it not be fairer than being given social housing for life regardless of income?
I know this will produce some anomalies but would it not be fairer than being given social housing for life regardless of income?
Answers
It's always seemed a difficult one ethically when you have one elderly person living alone in a family home.... should you move them away from the familiar environment where they may have local informal support networks to free up a property for a family or do you let them stay bearing in mind that the effect of moving them may be to incur care costs, or cause significant distress
Not sure of the answer... but to create rules where this could happen without assessing personal circumstances seems fraught with problems
Not sure of the answer... but to create rules where this could happen without assessing personal circumstances seems fraught with problems
Why is everybody assuming that anyone being forced to move, such as an elderly person occupying a 3/4 bedroom house will be moved out of their area away from friends and family. That does not have to be the case at all nor should it be. They should be rehoused as near to their immediate area as possible. And I'm afraid lots of us have to move when we are old, whether living in social housing or private. I expect there are a few on here who like me have had to downsize to release funds in their old age or because we can't afford to maintain a larger property.