ChatterBank1 min ago
Lottery - Tax For The Poor
40 Answers
Someone put on another thread that the National Lottery was akin to a tax for the poor.
I dont really play the lottery but it has always been a ritual to buy a scratch card on the way into work every Monday. Once a week wasnt going to break the bank, it was usually met my dissapointment anyway!
As money got tighter ironically I found myself buying a scratch card on the into work more regularly than once a week. Money that I could ill afford but I could see no other way out of a situation other than good fortune. Working more hours wasnt an option; I had 2 jobs already.
I referred to it as 'desperation tax'. I wasnt buying them for a bit of a 'flutter' I was depending on good fortune to get me out of a whole. The more you need luck the less likely it is to come your way. Before I would maybe win back the price of the ticket every 2 or 3 weeks. Nothing for months depsite buying 4 or 5 cards a week.
I think the poster was very right in describing the lottery as a tax for the poor. Or stupid if you examine the odds!
I dont really play the lottery but it has always been a ritual to buy a scratch card on the way into work every Monday. Once a week wasnt going to break the bank, it was usually met my dissapointment anyway!
As money got tighter ironically I found myself buying a scratch card on the into work more regularly than once a week. Money that I could ill afford but I could see no other way out of a situation other than good fortune. Working more hours wasnt an option; I had 2 jobs already.
I referred to it as 'desperation tax'. I wasnt buying them for a bit of a 'flutter' I was depending on good fortune to get me out of a whole. The more you need luck the less likely it is to come your way. Before I would maybe win back the price of the ticket every 2 or 3 weeks. Nothing for months depsite buying 4 or 5 cards a week.
I think the poster was very right in describing the lottery as a tax for the poor. Or stupid if you examine the odds!
Answers
What you are actually buying is hope - a precious commodity, albeit a forlorn one.
08:13 Wed 12th Jun 2013
it's going to cost 2 quid in the autumn
http:// www.dai lymail. co.uk/n ews/art icle-22 63367/L ottery- ticket- price-d oubles- 2-tax-p oor.htm l
http://
I've seen it described as a tax on stupidity before. I think that's a bit unfair.
Most people buy a lottery ticket for a bit of fun, because they enjoy checking the numbers, with no real expectation of winning. In that sense they get value for money for their quid or whatever it is now.
If people are blowing all their income on scratch cards they can't afford, again, I'd hesitate to even call that stupidity. It's more like a gambling addiction or other mental health issue.
Most people buy a lottery ticket for a bit of fun, because they enjoy checking the numbers, with no real expectation of winning. In that sense they get value for money for their quid or whatever it is now.
If people are blowing all their income on scratch cards they can't afford, again, I'd hesitate to even call that stupidity. It's more like a gambling addiction or other mental health issue.
Yes it's completely unfair and rather superior!
Running racehorses is even more expensive with probably just as long odds of producing a multi-million pound winner
I've yet to see anybody tell the queen that race horses are a tax on the rich and stupid!
I do the lottery and I'm quite aware of the odds but I like the fact that I just might win a load of money and getting a few quid back from three numbers now and again brightens my week.
Running racehorses is even more expensive with probably just as long odds of producing a multi-million pound winner
I've yet to see anybody tell the queen that race horses are a tax on the rich and stupid!
I do the lottery and I'm quite aware of the odds but I like the fact that I just might win a load of money and getting a few quid back from three numbers now and again brightens my week.
yes, a tax is no less a tax because it's avoidable; you might as well say the same of VAT. People still buy stuff and pay the VAT because it pleases them, and I don't see why they shouldn't buy lottery tickets on the same basis. Similar price to a portion of chips, and while there's every chance they'll be inedible and worthless there's a small chance they'll turn out to be made of solid gold.
Dear Booldawg,
You are spot-on - it is a tax on the poor and for the reason you give - HOPE (to get them out of the poverty hole). The rich can get richer in much easier ways like tax avoidance and investment in insider information on various activities from take-overs to horse racing (proven facts). Anyway, as a percentage of their income a lottery flutter is peanuts.
But if it's run by a private company how is it a tax? Answer - 'cos the government sanction them, knowing that for every £1 the poor give to Camelot a fraction of it goes to them via corporation tax.
A side-note Camelot have a guaranteed monopoly from the govt. So the company recently promising to keep the cost down to £1 per line plus a billion to good causes will be turned down - wait and see. Branson was turned down long ago. Interesting this love affair - maybe politicians get a back-hander via shareholding or lobbying? Question not accusation!
If the last question is "yes", it's a tax PLUS a scam.
Regards,
SIQ.
You are spot-on - it is a tax on the poor and for the reason you give - HOPE (to get them out of the poverty hole). The rich can get richer in much easier ways like tax avoidance and investment in insider information on various activities from take-overs to horse racing (proven facts). Anyway, as a percentage of their income a lottery flutter is peanuts.
But if it's run by a private company how is it a tax? Answer - 'cos the government sanction them, knowing that for every £1 the poor give to Camelot a fraction of it goes to them via corporation tax.
A side-note Camelot have a guaranteed monopoly from the govt. So the company recently promising to keep the cost down to £1 per line plus a billion to good causes will be turned down - wait and see. Branson was turned down long ago. Interesting this love affair - maybe politicians get a back-hander via shareholding or lobbying? Question not accusation!
If the last question is "yes", it's a tax PLUS a scam.
Regards,
SIQ.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.