News1 min ago
Boundary Fencing Replacement
11 Answers
Hi
Please can you help? My neighbour posted a letter through my door the other day requesting that I pay 50% of the cost (~£500 total) of replacing our party fence posts and panels (6 panels) since the posts/panels are rotten.
He claims that:
“In accordance to land registry this fence is the responsibility of both parties and any costs incurred have to be shared”
Further
“Covenants by the transferee(a)
To contribute equally with the owner of the adjoining plot towards the cost of maintenance and repair of any party boundary walls or railings.”
I’m not how this stands since the boundary is not a wall or railing – it’s a wooden fence.
I’ve checked my deeds and there is no indication of ownership on any of the boundaries, no T indication.
The fence is on the left side of my property (looking from the front). My understanding is that you are responsible for the boundary fence to the right of a property, indeed the previous owner made it clear that it was ‘his’ fence when it came to maintenance.
Additionally the present owners have contributed to the decay of the fence by failing to maintain their side by removing the coping post tops (water froze and split 2 of the posts)
Does anyone have experience in this area?
Thank you in advance.
J
Please can you help? My neighbour posted a letter through my door the other day requesting that I pay 50% of the cost (~£500 total) of replacing our party fence posts and panels (6 panels) since the posts/panels are rotten.
He claims that:
“In accordance to land registry this fence is the responsibility of both parties and any costs incurred have to be shared”
Further
“Covenants by the transferee(a)
To contribute equally with the owner of the adjoining plot towards the cost of maintenance and repair of any party boundary walls or railings.”
I’m not how this stands since the boundary is not a wall or railing – it’s a wooden fence.
I’ve checked my deeds and there is no indication of ownership on any of the boundaries, no T indication.
The fence is on the left side of my property (looking from the front). My understanding is that you are responsible for the boundary fence to the right of a property, indeed the previous owner made it clear that it was ‘his’ fence when it came to maintenance.
Additionally the present owners have contributed to the decay of the fence by failing to maintain their side by removing the coping post tops (water froze and split 2 of the posts)
Does anyone have experience in this area?
Thank you in advance.
J
Answers
1 to 11 of 11
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by josadler7. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
Morning, Have a quick look at this link as it may help you out a bit:
http://
Judging by the wording of the letter, can we assume that your neighbour and self do not get along well? (seems strange to send a letter when it could have been chatted about). Have you had 'words' about this fence before?
I would probably check through all your documentation again to see if any surveys show the boundary - also check the Deeds for WORDING on the promise from a neighbour to maintain the boundary fence, and also your title register. If you can't see anything then it's a trip to the solicitor I'm afraid - If the neighbour is already putting things in writing, it looks like he is serious about getting a monetary contribution from you and is starting a paper-trail, so I'd be a bit wary in the first instance.
I admit I always thought the boundary line was on the RHS as you look at the property too.
http://
Judging by the wording of the letter, can we assume that your neighbour and self do not get along well? (seems strange to send a letter when it could have been chatted about). Have you had 'words' about this fence before?
I would probably check through all your documentation again to see if any surveys show the boundary - also check the Deeds for WORDING on the promise from a neighbour to maintain the boundary fence, and also your title register. If you can't see anything then it's a trip to the solicitor I'm afraid - If the neighbour is already putting things in writing, it looks like he is serious about getting a monetary contribution from you and is starting a paper-trail, so I'd be a bit wary in the first instance.
I admit I always thought the boundary line was on the RHS as you look at the property too.
There is actually no legal requirement to have a fence on a boudary. This site may help.
http://
http://
Thank you Peaspeculiars - my neighbours tried to take down a tree (it shaded part of their garden when in leaf) that is on my land a couple of years and I politely objected - they were already in process when I arrived home one evening! Since then they have been 'frosty'... I can't find anything in the deeds there is no T mark on the plan either. Solicitor route would also be costly so I was hoping to avoid it but sounds like I may have to.
J
J
Are you happy to pay half? If you are then I would knock next door and ask for a look at the estimate he mentions with details of all costs involved. Then go away and get your own estimate so you know if it's about right.
If you're not happy to pay half then I would still knock but explain that you can't afford it/are happy with the way it is/some other reason.
But keep it civil and polite. We have always paid half of any fences with all our neighbours regardless of 'whose fence' it is deemed to be, makes for a much happier scenario.
If you're not happy to pay half then I would still knock but explain that you can't afford it/are happy with the way it is/some other reason.
But keep it civil and polite. We have always paid half of any fences with all our neighbours regardless of 'whose fence' it is deemed to be, makes for a much happier scenario.
Tricky one - especially after the 'tree incident' Blatant cheek in my opinion!
Yes, unfortunately the solicitors route may be costly - however, Postdog's link is great - if you go onto this section of the site: http://
it shows that you can obtain a copy of your neighbours and your own boundaries for £8 a pop (so might be a good starting point).
And Chrissa is correct, what can they do if you refuse? (It will cost them a lot of money in Sol's fees to take you to a small claims court)(maybe though, that's why they have begun the paper trail? Hmm...)
If it were me and my neighbours had already tried to cut down a tree illegally on my property, I would be tempted to say 'shove it' and see where it goes from there. It can get messy however, but if you already don't get on with them it's no great loss. I would just say I can't afford the cost at this moment in time, and every time they write you another 'demand' for money - They are trying to be clever by using the language as shown in their letter. But if they were really clued-up about the law and your need to contribute, surely they would not have leant over the fence to cut down your tree?
You could always say that you expect them to incur the full cost as compensation for the damage they did to said tree.
I am no expert on this though, so keep researching :-)
Yes, unfortunately the solicitors route may be costly - however, Postdog's link is great - if you go onto this section of the site: http://
it shows that you can obtain a copy of your neighbours and your own boundaries for £8 a pop (so might be a good starting point).
And Chrissa is correct, what can they do if you refuse? (It will cost them a lot of money in Sol's fees to take you to a small claims court)(maybe though, that's why they have begun the paper trail? Hmm...)
If it were me and my neighbours had already tried to cut down a tree illegally on my property, I would be tempted to say 'shove it' and see where it goes from there. It can get messy however, but if you already don't get on with them it's no great loss. I would just say I can't afford the cost at this moment in time, and every time they write you another 'demand' for money - They are trying to be clever by using the language as shown in their letter. But if they were really clued-up about the law and your need to contribute, surely they would not have leant over the fence to cut down your tree?
You could always say that you expect them to incur the full cost as compensation for the damage they did to said tree.
I am no expert on this though, so keep researching :-)
Neighbour disputes cost time and money and sour er neighbour relations
I strongly strongly recommend you quietly find out if you are half responsible and then pay up whether you are or not. - and dont worry the fact that you have paid half ! it cannot of itself bind your successors to do so in perpetuity
No one has mentioned getting the land registry entry for your own property but it costs ( but not that much ) and is centralised
I strongly strongly recommend you quietly find out if you are half responsible and then pay up whether you are or not. - and dont worry the fact that you have paid half ! it cannot of itself bind your successors to do so in perpetuity
No one has mentioned getting the land registry entry for your own property but it costs ( but not that much ) and is centralised
1 to 11 of 11
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.