News1 min ago
Cavity Wall Insulation
13 Answers
Is it ever wrong or inadvisable to get cavity wall insulation on your home?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by thesshhh. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Cavity wall insulation should NOT be used in walls which are regularly exposed to wind-driven rain (or where the brickwork is poorly maintained), as it can lead to damp problems:
https:/ /www.wh ich.co. uk/revi ews/ins ulation /articl e/cavit y-wall- insulat ion/cav ity-wal l-insul ation-d amp-pro blems
See also
https:/ /www.bb c.co.uk /news/u k-wales -421653 58
https:/
See also
https:/
Some years ago, we took advantage of a free British Gas offer to have our loft insulation upgraded and cavity wall insulation installed. The surveyor was happy about the former but would not recommend the latter. It was because the mortar in the brickwork had been 'gouged' out deliberately for aesthetic purposes. This left a step in the mortar allowing moisture to rest there. Never took it any further, just relied on the advice.
Yes, it can be inadvisable, as Chris's link shows. NHBC, among others, provide a map of the UK showing areas of extreme rainfall, and more importantly, exposure to high prevailing winds.
Most of us aren't included in these areas. In which case, there is no problem.
Cavity walls are widely misunderstood. The outer leaf is designed to be damp. It's what it's there for. There's a load of unjustified hysteria over damaged "pointing". Yes, it can slow the passage of water to the cavity, but the fact remains that the outer leaf is not a barrier.
The other consideration is the age of the building. Years ago, before the advent of thin profile stainless steel wall-ties, great big, clunky, galvanised ties were normal. These things invariably stored mortar droppings during the build. Adding cavity wall fill to these often resulted in damp migration.
So... what's your weather like, and how old is the house?
Most of us aren't included in these areas. In which case, there is no problem.
Cavity walls are widely misunderstood. The outer leaf is designed to be damp. It's what it's there for. There's a load of unjustified hysteria over damaged "pointing". Yes, it can slow the passage of water to the cavity, but the fact remains that the outer leaf is not a barrier.
The other consideration is the age of the building. Years ago, before the advent of thin profile stainless steel wall-ties, great big, clunky, galvanised ties were normal. These things invariably stored mortar droppings during the build. Adding cavity wall fill to these often resulted in damp migration.
So... what's your weather like, and how old is the house?
Well, what a compliment. Thank you for that, David.
1878? A little early for cavity walls, maybe. Although they were around in the 1800s.
Early ones were stone walls where "headers" were long stones laid perpendicular to the building.
These tied inner to outer leaves. I guess, being the industrial age, it wasn't long before steel was introduced.
Thanks again. :o)
1878? A little early for cavity walls, maybe. Although they were around in the 1800s.
Early ones were stone walls where "headers" were long stones laid perpendicular to the building.
These tied inner to outer leaves. I guess, being the industrial age, it wasn't long before steel was introduced.
Thanks again. :o)