Home & Garden43 mins ago
Can A Magnet Siphon A Ferrofluid Up An Inclined Pipe/Tube?
If you had a small lake of ferrofluid, could that fluid be siphoned up lots of pipes, using magnets, so that it fills a reservoir which then uses the same ferrofluid to power a hydroelectric generator and fill the original lake up?
Answers
the magnets would pull the ferrous particles out of the suspension fluid so most of the fluid would not make it up the hill.
19:18 Mon 18th May 2020
Woofgang- they use ferrofluid as a lubricant in speakers because it causes so little friction, so it might work.
Old Geezer- that's right, if the ferrofluid can be pulled up a pipe then why bother storing it in a reservoir? It could flow into a downpipe that leads to a generator. That might work.
Jno- yes, I suppose, but surely someone would have tried this already?
Old Geezer- that's right, if the ferrofluid can be pulled up a pipe then why bother storing it in a reservoir? It could flow into a downpipe that leads to a generator. That might work.
Jno- yes, I suppose, but surely someone would have tried this already?
waterboatman- this video on youtube https:/ /youtu. be/xBCV C-bvaFg
seems to say that the particles wouldn't separate because of the surfactant and the small size of the particles. He explains it around 7 minutes in. Can't use a pump because that would use electricity. What I'm trying to find out is if the magnet can lift the ferrofluid and overcome gravity then surely it could be used to create hydroelectricity.
seems to say that the particles wouldn't separate because of the surfactant and the small size of the particles. He explains it around 7 minutes in. Can't use a pump because that would use electricity. What I'm trying to find out is if the magnet can lift the ferrofluid and overcome gravity then surely it could be used to create hydroelectricity.
mibn2- yeah, siphon was a bad choice of word. What I mean is, if the magnet pulls the fluid out of the top of the tube, wouldn't the rest of the fluid follow on and be pulled out with suction or capillary action? The video on youtube seems to state that the particles would remain mixed in with the fluid, so all of the fluid in the tube would be attracted by the magnet when it is pulled up.
waterboatman- the thing about ferrofluid though, is that it was created in the sixties to make rocket fuel moveable in space. It turned out to be too impure to mix with the rocket fuel but we're left with a very cool liquid that can be moved by a magnet. My problem is that I need to know if it could be moved upward, against gravity, but no one seems to have tried that on youtube, they just make spiky shapes.(which are still cool)
Okay, I've been watching a few videos on siphons/syphons, and I think I've found a way to get this to work. The tube should look like a walking cane, with the bend at the top, and the outlet facing down. Same as before the inlet is immersed in the lower reservoir of ferrofluid, the rest of the tube is already full all the way to the top and round the bend and going downwards (there is a way of doing this with a top up valve at the top of the bend, this technology already exists). Then if the magnet is placed under the downward facing outlet, the magnet will pull the ferrofluid down (with gravity on our side this time) this will create a vacuum in the bend which should pull up the rest of the ferrofluid and create a flow. The ferrofluid will flow onto the magnet and the first few litres of fluid will be stuck to the magnet forming those cool spikey shapes. But at some point enough ferrofluid will flow onto the magnet (which can only 'hold' so much) and the excess will flow over the magnet (and spikes), falling into the upper reservoir. This upper reservoir is under the magnet but is still way above the lower reservoir. The ferrofluid can then be used in a normal hydroelectric generator as if it was water. Any opinions on this? Please let me know what you think, especially any physicists or engineers.
I see the makings of a perpetual motion machine. Hello !
https:/ /en.wik ipedia. org/wik i/Perpe tual_mo tion
Don't schools teach physics any more? Does anybody listen?
https:/
Don't schools teach physics any more? Does anybody listen?
AZardoz - I see what you're saying and be assured that I'm not a crank or a fraudster. Okay, the hydroelectric part of the idea isn't perpetual motion, it is using the force of gravity to create electricity.
Now the sun, heats and evaporates the sea water, turning it into clouds, which rain on the mountain, which runs down a river to the hydroelectric power station, then out to sea again. This isn't perpetual motion, this is in fact nuclear, being that the heat comes from the sun, which will die one day.
Now in this system, I am just trying to get this amazing ferrofluid up to a higher level using a magnet. This magnet will wear down eventually and have to be replaced or recharged. There is nothing perpetual about it.
So rather than ranting about bad education and no one listening, why not tell me which part of my idea won't hold up. I welcome your constructive input and I want this to be an interesting and friendly discussion during lockdown.
Now the sun, heats and evaporates the sea water, turning it into clouds, which rain on the mountain, which runs down a river to the hydroelectric power station, then out to sea again. This isn't perpetual motion, this is in fact nuclear, being that the heat comes from the sun, which will die one day.
Now in this system, I am just trying to get this amazing ferrofluid up to a higher level using a magnet. This magnet will wear down eventually and have to be replaced or recharged. There is nothing perpetual about it.
So rather than ranting about bad education and no one listening, why not tell me which part of my idea won't hold up. I welcome your constructive input and I want this to be an interesting and friendly discussion during lockdown.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.