ChatterBank2 mins ago
Why Did Sunak Reject Energy Bill Freezr
19 Answers
…that was actually proposed by the companies themselves when he was Chancellor?
https:/ /www.ex press.c o.uk/ne ws/poli tics/16 55182/r ishi-su nak-rej ected-p lans-en ergy-co mpanies -freeze -bills- cost-of -living /amp
Why do multi-millionaires enjoy playing Risk and Monopoly with the public and their incomes? Is it some sort of games that only the wealthy and privileged play?
He had all the solutions 4 days ago, why the sudden realisation?
https:/ /news.s ky.com/ story/t ory-lea dership -race-r ishi-su nak-unv eils-pl ans-to- slash-e nergy-b ills-fo r-milli ons-dur ing-cos t-of-li ving-cr isis-12 670910
https:/
Why do multi-millionaires enjoy playing Risk and Monopoly with the public and their incomes? Is it some sort of games that only the wealthy and privileged play?
He had all the solutions 4 days ago, why the sudden realisation?
https:/
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by FatticusInch. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.bobbinwales
//He did target on the poorest eg for band D and below
He didn't do enough though...he underestimated how long and big it would be
Wasn't labour/snp/lib dems plan 29 billion?//
No idea. Link?
Or are you getting confused with this?
Fossil fuel giants have seen their profits soar. BP and Shell made £29 billion in profits in the first six months of the year alone.
//He did target on the poorest eg for band D and below
He didn't do enough though...he underestimated how long and big it would be
Wasn't labour/snp/lib dems plan 29 billion?//
No idea. Link?
Or are you getting confused with this?
Fossil fuel giants have seen their profits soar. BP and Shell made £29 billion in profits in the first six months of the year alone.
naomi24
//They see it as relevant because they can't be seen to concede that the winner is already decided.... but she is. His deliberations are futile.//
That’s actually the irrelevant part.
The media are speculating as to why he didn’t act accordingly whilst Chancellor, when he could have headed off the crisis somewhat.
//They see it as relevant because they can't be seen to concede that the winner is already decided.... but she is. His deliberations are futile.//
That’s actually the irrelevant part.
The media are speculating as to why he didn’t act accordingly whilst Chancellor, when he could have headed off the crisis somewhat.
fatticusinch argues for the sake of it.. He keeps inferring I made up the 20 billion figure even though its in the link .
Here's a quote from the sky article "The Labour leader says his party's £29bn energy plan will save the typical family £1,000 immediately, get energy costs under control for the future and help tackle inflation."
There £29billion.
I agree with TTT
Here's a quote from the sky article "The Labour leader says his party's £29bn energy plan will save the typical family £1,000 immediately, get energy costs under control for the future and help tackle inflation."
There £29billion.
I agree with TTT
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.