Home & Garden1 min ago
Ronald Fiddler, The Case For Due Process...
24 Answers
Charity work in Afghanistan.
Seized illegally by the Bush regime and imprisoned in Guantanamo.
Stayed there under the Obama regime
Released under pressure from UK government.
Compensated for illegal detention.
Killed himself in suicide attack.
Seized illegally by the Bush regime and imprisoned in Guantanamo.
Stayed there under the Obama regime
Released under pressure from UK government.
Compensated for illegal detention.
Killed himself in suicide attack.
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by vetuste_ennemi. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Pretty good analysis. Well up to your usual standard, JNO.
More challenging attempt (if you're going for a beta grade) is explaining why a British born black guy would sympathise with the Taleban in the first place. Was Ronald's life so desperate here? Who's family or friends was he siding with when he moved to Afghanistan?
More challenging attempt (if you're going for a beta grade) is explaining why a British born black guy would sympathise with the Taleban in the first place. Was Ronald's life so desperate here? Who's family or friends was he siding with when he moved to Afghanistan?
Follow-up question.
I don't think a million pounds paid by the tax payer is that important. I think Ronald's suicide is of no consequence whatsoever.
But, do you think Ronald's sharing his death with fellow citizens in the UK(possibly), or with Shia Muslims(actually) in Iraq is an equally acceptable price?
I don't think a million pounds paid by the tax payer is that important. I think Ronald's suicide is of no consequence whatsoever.
But, do you think Ronald's sharing his death with fellow citizens in the UK(possibly), or with Shia Muslims(actually) in Iraq is an equally acceptable price?
Nice one Khandro.
There is definitely one party to blame as jno has pointed out: Bliar.
But more questions need to be asked. Blunket said none of them would ever pose a threat(or something like that) at the time, seems that was not true (as most sane people thought at the time).
This is one thing that really does need a detailed enquiry, an unhindered one on TV with Bliar as first to be questioned.
There is definitely one party to blame as jno has pointed out: Bliar.
But more questions need to be asked. Blunket said none of them would ever pose a threat(or something like that) at the time, seems that was not true (as most sane people thought at the time).
This is one thing that really does need a detailed enquiry, an unhindered one on TV with Bliar as first to be questioned.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.