Case So Bad, Jury Excused From Service...
News3 mins ago
No best answer has yet been selected by tali122. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Let's start at the last part of your question first, if I may... actually, anytime you look at a star,our Sun or even the moon, you are, in a very real sense, looking back in time. The light from the sun, for example takes, on average 8 minutes to reach earth. So, you are actually seeing something that happened 8 minutes ago. Same principle applies to the theoretical looking into a black hole.
Before any meaningful discussion can take place about the theorized phenomena, we have to understand that facts and figures about black holes and their behavior are few and far between. Due to their nature, no one has actually ever seen one. I know, I know, there are photographs of x-rays escaping from what are probably black holes, but by their very nature, they can't bee seen. My understanding is that the smallest theorized black hole is about 8 miles across. This includes the accretion disk and event horizon. A hypothesis that is developing talks about minature black holes, the size of just several billions of tons, but it is highly suspect for now, whereas massive black holes are believed to be several billion solar masses in size. In each, however, the singularity, the center of the hole where nothing, not even light (exception x-rays) can escape are infinitely small but infinitely dense.
By the way, black holes can be spinning ones or stationary ones, according to current theory.
The quantum physics involved in predicting, identifying and quantifying black holes is so esoteric, that most scientists involved spend their entire professional lives devoted to its singularity (pun only slightly intended).
Lastly, as references your question (which I haven't answered very well) understand that not all dying stars become black holes, thankfully. Else we wouldn't be here to talk about it.
There is a theory that black holes evaporate by giving off Hawking radiation. This happens when a thingy spontaneously appears just outside the edge of the black hole, and splits into two sub-thingies. Normally the two sub-thingies re-combine and disappear again, but if it is close to the edge of a black hole then it is possible for one sub-thingy to fall in and disappear, leaving the other sub-thingy to escape. This provides a mechanism whereby energy can appear to be removed from the black hole so that it eventually disappears.
The whirlpool-type shape that they show in computer animations is not the real shape of a black hole; it is sort-of spherical. The whirlpool-shape is the 3-dimensional representation of a distorted 2-dimensional space; it is a simplified version of what a black hole would look like if we could see it from 4-dimensions. The 3-dimensioanl space in which we live is distorted by gravity into a 4th dimension.
gravity waves?
can i point out that in hawking radiation, the 'virtual particles' are a positive and negative particle anti-particle pair. virtual particles are created from nothing. take 0 and minus a positive 1. you are left with a positive and a negative 1. if one half gets pulled in to the black hole and the other escapes then nothing is evaporating. assuming that on average, an equal amount of + and - virtual particles are pulled in then they will nullify each other but the rest of the black holes mass will remain unaffected.
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.