Cadaver Dogs/blood Dogs

[tinkerbell23]

How possible is it that the dogs are wrong!?

Is there anything that could be mistaken for the scent of a dead body/blood? X

[spathiphyllum]

Watch the rest.. you’ll find whT the dogs found, could match any one of us, but eapecially gery, kate or the twins.

Its not how affective are the dogs, it’s what they actially found


A very weak, poor sample

[spathiphyllum]

I should put auto correct on lol

[spathiphyllum]

Tinks the samples that were found could match madaline as much as they match the people testing the samples
Let alone direct family

[tinkerbell23]

Im making my way through.... the dog thing throws me but I shall see!!!!!!!!! X

[tinkerbell23]

Say these dogs smell blood.... could be anyones whos ever been in the apartment or car? X

[Mamyalynne]

Nothing is certain, figures for false positives from cadaver dogs vary depending what you read.

[pixie374]

Yes, any human cadaver or blood. Personally, I can't think of anything that would be confused with those smells, but they don't use the dog's responses alone. They test the blood they find etc too. I believed the dog's on the documentary. They seemed sure. Very strange.

[Peter Pedant]

well they are trained on rotting pork chops so yeah I suppose they could be taken in
(and tell poikies )

fresh dead pork and pongy ....

OP should be posting under -- tinker smell...

[spathiphyllum]

Tinks yes could be anyones, but a masive examination took place on this tiny sample

[spathiphyllum]

What threw me os the dog barked after the man got on his knees and pointed his finger same with the car

[Peter Pedant]

which program is this
and does the dog talk?

[pixie374]

The Madeleine McCann doc, PP. Yes, the dog barks only if it finds those things.

[pixie374]

Netflix

[tinkerbell23]

As you say Pixie.... very strange.

X

[Patsy33]

I remember reading the British cadaver dogs brought in, had a 100% record...

[Peter Pedant]

the dogs are wrong
the child has been fish food for ten years ....

[spathiphyllum]

there is no question that the dogs found something. It's 'what' they found. And what they found, wasn't even sustainable enough to prove Madeline was even in the apartment.

think it was like 16 out of 36 match or 26.. which they said may sound a lot, but we all share a lot of dna, and the dna they found, was just as likely to be kate or gerrys, or even the twins, or even people in the lab testing department..

but there is no question that the dogs found something or not.. they certainly did find 'something'

[spathiphyllum]

PP the dogs can find evidence from over ten years ago.. they also went in quite a while ago, not recently

[pixie374]

It only human they respond to, spath. Not animal... they could possibly make a mistake of course, but there didn't seem to be any doubt to them. The dogs' reactions made me go cold.

[pixie374]

Dead human...