Food & Drink1 min ago
Turned down for insurance claim
Further to my previous post http://www.theanswerb...y/Question980504.html
The canopy company told me to make an insurance claim which I did, the assessor has been out today and turned down my claim.
He says it was obvious that my house was built using London bricks (with a cavity) and before fixing the canopy to the wall the installer should have either a) checked the cavity had been filled or b) fixed the canopy at the solid outer edges of the bricks. As things stand the bolts which hold up the canopy just go through the outer brick facing and nothing else.................what do I do (the canopy is still under warranty).
The canopy company told me to make an insurance claim which I did, the assessor has been out today and turned down my claim.
He says it was obvious that my house was built using London bricks (with a cavity) and before fixing the canopy to the wall the installer should have either a) checked the cavity had been filled or b) fixed the canopy at the solid outer edges of the bricks. As things stand the bolts which hold up the canopy just go through the outer brick facing and nothing else.................what do I do (the canopy is still under warranty).
Answers
1 to 14 of 14
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by craft1948. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
Hi craft
precisely what are you claiming for?? damage to the canopy and damage to the build itself presumably? I also presume that the loss adjuster is from your house insurer?
to be perfectly honest, there is no reason why your household insurer can turn the claim down for one - london bricks or no london bricks - bricks are bricks and as long as this was stated when taking the insurance policy out, your insurer should have to pay for the damage under the Storm section of your policy. secondly, speak to the canopy installers politley and ask them what they intend to do about the damage? if they say it isnt their fault, request their public liability insurance details and advise you shall be filing a claim against them.
precisely what are you claiming for?? damage to the canopy and damage to the build itself presumably? I also presume that the loss adjuster is from your house insurer?
to be perfectly honest, there is no reason why your household insurer can turn the claim down for one - london bricks or no london bricks - bricks are bricks and as long as this was stated when taking the insurance policy out, your insurer should have to pay for the damage under the Storm section of your policy. secondly, speak to the canopy installers politley and ask them what they intend to do about the damage? if they say it isnt their fault, request their public liability insurance details and advise you shall be filing a claim against them.
benn the assessor's decision in turning down the insurance claim was that there was nothing wrong with the bricks before the canopy was fitted, and nothing wrong with the canopy either, but that the fault lies with the way the canopy was fitted to the brickwork, which was inadequate to take the snowfall. They had put bolts through the brickwork but because London bricks have a 'frog' the only thing holding the bolts was the brick fascia, as opposed to for instance, solid engineering bricks.
craft - ask the adjuster to point out the section of cover applicable (which will be buildings) and then ask him to show you the exclusion relating to this damage - if he cant do that he cant turn down the claim
if he does do that, let me know which exclusion he is applying and i shall let you know how to combat it, if possible
if he does do that, let me know which exclusion he is applying and i shall let you know how to combat it, if possible
Crafty, my synpathies. You really are caught in the middle here.
I'd love to talk to your builder about this. I'll bet he, as with others in the Trade, isn't a big fan of cantilevered structures. They put a hell of a load on their mountings. This is why manufactures usually specify a minimun height of brickwork above the canopy, to counter the turning force imposed by the canopy and wind/snow load etc.
OK, that's just a personal view.
What's important is that it's been there, happliy for four years. This year has seen some pretty unusual extra loads imposed on structures. That's what insurance should be for.
To be fair to the installers, assuming they fitted exactly as the manufacturers dictate, then they have done the job "in good faith". My first thoughts (in your previous Q,) was it might have been a bit of a quick, "cowboy" installation. It's beginning to look as though they simply fitted it using tried and tested standards.
This is only my opinion, but I think the Assessor is struggling. The "frog" business is a nonsense. It's a "dent" in the brick that is fully filled with mortar when laid. It is NOT a void.
Solid bricks are rarely used these days........... certainly not engineering bricks halfway up a standard cavity wall. In fact, many commonly used facing bricks are made with several holes or voids within them as normal.
I'd like to hear your builder's reply when you tell him about the "frog" issue.
It's been there for four years.......... it's been subjected to an abnormal load ........ Insurance companies will habitually clutch at any available straws.
I'd love to talk to your builder about this. I'll bet he, as with others in the Trade, isn't a big fan of cantilevered structures. They put a hell of a load on their mountings. This is why manufactures usually specify a minimun height of brickwork above the canopy, to counter the turning force imposed by the canopy and wind/snow load etc.
OK, that's just a personal view.
What's important is that it's been there, happliy for four years. This year has seen some pretty unusual extra loads imposed on structures. That's what insurance should be for.
To be fair to the installers, assuming they fitted exactly as the manufacturers dictate, then they have done the job "in good faith". My first thoughts (in your previous Q,) was it might have been a bit of a quick, "cowboy" installation. It's beginning to look as though they simply fitted it using tried and tested standards.
This is only my opinion, but I think the Assessor is struggling. The "frog" business is a nonsense. It's a "dent" in the brick that is fully filled with mortar when laid. It is NOT a void.
Solid bricks are rarely used these days........... certainly not engineering bricks halfway up a standard cavity wall. In fact, many commonly used facing bricks are made with several holes or voids within them as normal.
I'd like to hear your builder's reply when you tell him about the "frog" issue.
It's been there for four years.......... it's been subjected to an abnormal load ........ Insurance companies will habitually clutch at any available straws.
1 to 14 of 14
