Quizzes & Puzzles6 mins ago
Staggered payments!??
11 Answers
My boss (having recently put me on the payroll) is for some reason staggering my monthly wages. For example, last month I was paid from the beginning of the month up to one week shy of the end, I was told it would be added onto the next month's pay.
This month, I was paid up to the 18th of the month - last month's deficit was added on, but ...the 18th!! That leaves nearly two weeks worth of work unpaid for. I was told again that it will be added onto next months pay.
Do I have any legal right to demand that I be paid in full for work I have done ?
Why is he doing this ? It's really screwing with my budgetting plans.
This month, I was paid up to the 18th of the month - last month's deficit was added on, but ...the 18th!! That leaves nearly two weeks worth of work unpaid for. I was told again that it will be added onto next months pay.
Do I have any legal right to demand that I be paid in full for work I have done ?
Why is he doing this ? It's really screwing with my budgetting plans.
Answers
The legal requirement that the employer must comply with is at least this list of bits of information regarding your employment. These do form part of your employment contract (but are by no means all of the contract).
http:// www. direct. gov... dConditions/ DG_ 175704
As you will see, it includes a requirement to tell you when (within the week or month)...
08:39 Tue 29th May 2012
So far there doesn't seem to be one - last month I was paid on the 27th with that weeks pay 'to be carried over' to the following month. This month I was paid yesterday with the same arrangement: for days worked up to and including the 18th. I was told, "this is the only way I can get you paid by the end of the month" (I can't see why).
The legal requirement that the employer must comply with is at least this list of bits of information regarding your employment. These do form part of your employment contract (but are by no means all of the contract).
http:// www.dir ect.gov ...dCon ditions /DG_175 704
As you will see, it includes a requirement to tell you when (within the week or month) you will be paid.
The employer cannot mess you about by changing the date to suit its cashflow issues.
It doesn't need Union membership to sort this sort of nonsense out - this is easy.
http://
As you will see, it includes a requirement to tell you when (within the week or month) you will be paid.
The employer cannot mess you about by changing the date to suit its cashflow issues.
It doesn't need Union membership to sort this sort of nonsense out - this is easy.
Thanks for all the answers - particularly Buildersmate, and thanks for the link.
Dzug, so far there has been a whole week of actual hours worked left unpaid for ('to be tagged onto next months pay') for the second time now. I'm wondering if (as Buildersmate suggested) he's deliberately keeping my pay below a certain threshold to suit his cashflow.
Daffy, there has been no contract of employment drafted afaik- the company being relatively new.
OJ - prior to going on the payroll, I was paid directly, as if working as a self employed contractor.
Hi Ummm - apart from this malarky, yes v well thanks - shame there's no Glast this year eh ! x
Dzug, so far there has been a whole week of actual hours worked left unpaid for ('to be tagged onto next months pay') for the second time now. I'm wondering if (as Buildersmate suggested) he's deliberately keeping my pay below a certain threshold to suit his cashflow.
Daffy, there has been no contract of employment drafted afaik- the company being relatively new.
OJ - prior to going on the payroll, I was paid directly, as if working as a self employed contractor.
Hi Ummm - apart from this malarky, yes v well thanks - shame there's no Glast this year eh ! x
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.