Jobs & Education3 mins ago
Does The Army Know If It's Comming Or Going?
28 Answers
Why is the Army running an extensive recruitment campaign at the same time as making a load of redundencies?
http:// www.cre ativere view.co .uk/cr- blog/20 13/may/ army-bo ots
The campaign aims to dispel the misconception that the army is not hiring and hopes to bring 10,000 new recruits into the army over the coming year.
http:// www.bbc .co.uk/ news/uk -229474 36
Of the 4,480 Army personnel being made redundant, 3,765, or 84%, have volunteered for redundancy,
http://
The campaign aims to dispel the misconception that the army is not hiring and hopes to bring 10,000 new recruits into the army over the coming year.
http://
Of the 4,480 Army personnel being made redundant, 3,765, or 84%, have volunteered for redundancy,
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by jake-the-peg. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.AOG,
I don't know what you think that meant, but this is what I meant
http:// idioms. thefree diction ary.com /Fresh+ Blood
I don't know what you think that meant, but this is what I meant
http://
/// There's always a need for fresh blood. ///
"What a horrible thing to say, but not unexpected coming from the likes of you.
Let's hope you never find yourself in need of their protection. "
What's wrong with that?? The army needs fresh blood like all organisations. It may be a rather unfortunate way of putting it in this case, but it's still an apt way of putting it.
If I was sandy I'd be a bit offended by being referred to as "the likes of you" but the likes of me probably has no business being offended on behalf of the likes of him :-)
"What a horrible thing to say, but not unexpected coming from the likes of you.
Let's hope you never find yourself in need of their protection. "
What's wrong with that?? The army needs fresh blood like all organisations. It may be a rather unfortunate way of putting it in this case, but it's still an apt way of putting it.
If I was sandy I'd be a bit offended by being referred to as "the likes of you" but the likes of me probably has no business being offended on behalf of the likes of him :-)
The Government's policy of relying on a large Reserve force is doomed to failure, as highlighted the other night on a Sky Special about it.
Should it go a little bit 'Pete Tong' elsewhere in the not too distant future we will not have the resources nor time to marshal the necessary.
There are certain theatres of operations where boots on the ground is the required measure and we will fall woefully short.
When the Septics express concerns about our military cuts, you know it's time to worry.
Should it go a little bit 'Pete Tong' elsewhere in the not too distant future we will not have the resources nor time to marshal the necessary.
There are certain theatres of operations where boots on the ground is the required measure and we will fall woefully short.
When the Septics express concerns about our military cuts, you know it's time to worry.
-- answer removed --
//There are certain theatres of operations where boots on the ground is the required measure and we will fall woefully short. //
Theatres of operation - that's a great euphemism for other people's countries isn't it?
The Army haven't protected *us* for over half a century - they protect British interests overseas and in the process stir up the sort of resentment that actually endangers us more here.
How many terrorist attrocities do the Swiss suffer?
The armed forces in Afghanistan do not make us one iota safer here in the UK if they did we wouldn't be pulling them out.
But all that's by the bye - I guess what's happening here is that they're doing what may businesses are doing still recruiting front line people and trying to cut the number of support staff that cost money but don't directly contribute to front line operations.
Making the Army more efficient
Mind you if you're kicked out onto civvy street it must be somewhat galling to see the ads
Theatres of operation - that's a great euphemism for other people's countries isn't it?
The Army haven't protected *us* for over half a century - they protect British interests overseas and in the process stir up the sort of resentment that actually endangers us more here.
How many terrorist attrocities do the Swiss suffer?
The armed forces in Afghanistan do not make us one iota safer here in the UK if they did we wouldn't be pulling them out.
But all that's by the bye - I guess what's happening here is that they're doing what may businesses are doing still recruiting front line people and trying to cut the number of support staff that cost money but don't directly contribute to front line operations.
Making the Army more efficient
Mind you if you're kicked out onto civvy street it must be somewhat galling to see the ads
-- answer removed --
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.