Crosswords0 min ago
Surely The Police Have Much More Important Things To Investigate?
41 Answers
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by anotheoldgit. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.andy-hughes
You could use that argument about any crime not deemed to be 'serious' - but a crime is a crime - so it gets investigated.
Really,
https:/ /www.lo ckrite. org/blo g/polic e-busy- investi gate-bu rglarie s/
You could use that argument about any crime not deemed to be 'serious' - but a crime is a crime - so it gets investigated.
Really,
https:/
It's worse than I expected.
/// Discussing the ‘Golliwog’ image on Robertson’s jam is “inherently racist” as the term is so offensive, a judge ruled. ///
http:// www.tel egraph. co.uk/n ews/ukn ews/law -and-or der/105 25121/D iscussi ng-Robe rtsons- jam-gol liwog-l abel-is -racist -judge- rules.h tml
http:// www.the guardia n.com/p olitics /2009/d ec/18/p hilip-d avies-p olitica l-corre ctness- campaig n
/// Discussing the ‘Golliwog’ image on Robertson’s jam is “inherently racist” as the term is so offensive, a judge ruled. ///
http://
http://
Surely not illegal since they can be bought on-line?
http:// www.jok e.co.uk /adult- golly-c ostume~ 73543/
http://
PC Plod was always investigating the Gollys in my Noddy Books. They carjacked him,nicked his clothes and escaped in his car leaving him sobbing,naked,sitting in the middle of the road in the woods.
"Oh it isn't very good in the dark dark wood
In the middle of the night when it isn't very light"
Brings tears to my eyes now.
"Oh it isn't very good in the dark dark wood
In the middle of the night when it isn't very light"
Brings tears to my eyes now.
// You could use that argument about any crime not deemed to be 'serious' - but a crime is a crime - so it gets investigated. //
nope - that was shot as long ago as 1968 - Blackburn v MPC
[ application to order the MPcommissioner to investigate vice was refused on the grounds that he had investigated SOME and therefore had complied with the law ]
nope - that was shot as long ago as 1968 - Blackburn v MPC
[ application to order the MPcommissioner to investigate vice was refused on the grounds that he had investigated SOME and therefore had complied with the law ]
And....
http:// www.tel egraph. co.uk/n ews/ukn ews/law -and-or der/117 55995/P olice-a re-turn ing-a-b lind-ey e-to-ca nnabis- across- the-cou ntry-ex perts-c laim.ht ml
And....
http:// www.for ecourtt rader.c o.uk/ne ws/full story.p hp/aid/ 10006/P rotests _after_ police_ refuse_ to_inve stigate _drive- offs.ht ml
To save you wading through the article, which is about "bilking" (making off without paying) from petrol stations:
"The Force will no longer be deploying officers to attend these reports and make contact with the member of the public on behalf of the garage [i.e. interview suspects], unless there is evidence of linked offending or vulnerability.
Garages are able to seek the vehicle owner’s details and pursue a civil recovery of this debt themselves and will be provided with the detail of how to do so on reporting. They will also be provided with advice on preventing these matters occurring. There are many garages across Devon and Cornwall who have put in place measures which ensure it is not possible to leave their forecourts without paying for fuel."
So basically the offence of theft or fraud is not to be pursued and the victim has to make his own arrangements to seek recovery of the "debt".
The police are selective in many areas when it comes to what they will or will not investigate. They have already abandoned all bank card crime. They say it is a question of priorities. Well I would suggest that it is of greater priority to investigate the burglary of a dwelling rather than to look into somebody dressed as a "golly".
http://
And....
http://
To save you wading through the article, which is about "bilking" (making off without paying) from petrol stations:
"The Force will no longer be deploying officers to attend these reports and make contact with the member of the public on behalf of the garage [i.e. interview suspects], unless there is evidence of linked offending or vulnerability.
Garages are able to seek the vehicle owner’s details and pursue a civil recovery of this debt themselves and will be provided with the detail of how to do so on reporting. They will also be provided with advice on preventing these matters occurring. There are many garages across Devon and Cornwall who have put in place measures which ensure it is not possible to leave their forecourts without paying for fuel."
So basically the offence of theft or fraud is not to be pursued and the victim has to make his own arrangements to seek recovery of the "debt".
The police are selective in many areas when it comes to what they will or will not investigate. They have already abandoned all bank card crime. They say it is a question of priorities. Well I would suggest that it is of greater priority to investigate the burglary of a dwelling rather than to look into somebody dressed as a "golly".
not wishing to hijack the thread Nooj
I was investigated for 'Bilking' - driving away without paying
but my credit card company showed that £1 had been taken at the very time and place of the alleged theft. I am sure you will realise that this showed that I could not have been convicted under the Theft Act 1968 as I obviously had an intention to pay
This did not stop the garage alleging theft even tho they must have seen me putting a credit card into the petrol pump - and it would be on CCTV - that is they were alleging ( like the Primark breast feeder) something they knew not to be true.
CCTV on demand not available and the garage owner started laughing when I asked for it. No number available to apply to as they were obviously using CCTV for debt collection and not detection of crime
and no one in the least bit interested in the Chief Constables putting their shoulders to debt collecting for a section of society. No money passed hands by the way - between the petrol sellers and the police for the information....
rant over
I was investigated for 'Bilking' - driving away without paying
but my credit card company showed that £1 had been taken at the very time and place of the alleged theft. I am sure you will realise that this showed that I could not have been convicted under the Theft Act 1968 as I obviously had an intention to pay
This did not stop the garage alleging theft even tho they must have seen me putting a credit card into the petrol pump - and it would be on CCTV - that is they were alleging ( like the Primark breast feeder) something they knew not to be true.
CCTV on demand not available and the garage owner started laughing when I asked for it. No number available to apply to as they were obviously using CCTV for debt collection and not detection of crime
and no one in the least bit interested in the Chief Constables putting their shoulders to debt collecting for a section of society. No money passed hands by the way - between the petrol sellers and the police for the information....
rant over
aaargh
// So basically the offence of theft or fraud is not to be pursued and the victim has to make his own arrangements to seek recovery of the "debt". //
yes my point is that as a consumer of this activity - it may well be debt and the allegations were automatic ( and done by spotty teenagers)
yes some of it may be the fault of the garage....
// So basically the offence of theft or fraud is not to be pursued and the victim has to make his own arrangements to seek recovery of the "debt". //
yes my point is that as a consumer of this activity - it may well be debt and the allegations were automatic ( and done by spotty teenagers)
yes some of it may be the fault of the garage....
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.