ChatterBank10 mins ago
Should Bbc Stars Be Forced To Reveal Their Salaries?
http:// www.ind ependen t.co.uk /news/m edia/tv -radio/ bbc-sta rs-who- earn-mo re-than -the-pr ime-min ister-s hould-b e-force d-to-pu blish-t heir-sa laries- say-mps -a71675 16.html
And why is the Prime Minister's salary be used as a benchmark for this pointless exercise?
And why is the Prime Minister's salary be used as a benchmark for this pointless exercise?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by sp1814. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.I always think of 'The Blood Donor' sketch with Tony Hancock -
"Do you know, Adam Faith earns ten times as much as the Prime Minister, is that right? ........ IS THAT RIGHT!!!!
I suppose it depends on whether you like Adam Faith and what your politics are ....."
That was over fifty years ago - nothing has changed.
"Do you know, Adam Faith earns ten times as much as the Prime Minister, is that right? ........ IS THAT RIGHT!!!!
I suppose it depends on whether you like Adam Faith and what your politics are ....."
That was over fifty years ago - nothing has changed.
Jackthehat - //I'm not so much bothered by what they earn, as I am interested in what the BBC pays them (yes, I realise that it's the same thing). //
I don't think it is.
If you take Premier League footballers, whose salaries are similarly contentious - a player who is paid £5million a year cannot reasonably be said to have earned it - so I believe the two are distinct and different.
I earn a million pounds a week, my employer sadly pays me significantly less than that!!!
I don't think it is.
If you take Premier League footballers, whose salaries are similarly contentious - a player who is paid £5million a year cannot reasonably be said to have earned it - so I believe the two are distinct and different.
I earn a million pounds a week, my employer sadly pays me significantly less than that!!!
Actually, you could argue that because the BBC is publicly funded, we as licence payers should know what stars earn.
I don't think that's right. Salaries of BBC executives should be made known, but not the salaries of stars. There is a 'going rate' (known in business as the 'compa ratio'), which apply to back office staff - but money paid to 'front of camera' talent is commercially sensitive.
I would mean the BBC would be forced into a commercially compromised position not imposed on any other broadcaster.
Basically, if ITV wanted to poach Claudia Winkleman, they would know exactly how much to offer, but if the BBC wanted to sign up Ant & Dec, they wouldn't.
I don't think that's right. Salaries of BBC executives should be made known, but not the salaries of stars. There is a 'going rate' (known in business as the 'compa ratio'), which apply to back office staff - but money paid to 'front of camera' talent is commercially sensitive.
I would mean the BBC would be forced into a commercially compromised position not imposed on any other broadcaster.
Basically, if ITV wanted to poach Claudia Winkleman, they would know exactly how much to offer, but if the BBC wanted to sign up Ant & Dec, they wouldn't.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.