Motoring3 mins ago
Oxford College Bans The Christian Union From Its Freshers’ Fair Over Fears It Would Be “Alienating” For Students Of Other Religions.
94 Answers
http:// www.exp ress.co .uk/new s/uk/86 4492/Ba lliol-C ollege- Oxford- Univers ity-Chr istian- Union-b anned-f reshers -fair-h omophob ic
Why wasn't it deemed unlawful under the Religious discrimination act?
Well it would have been if they had banned Islam.
Why wasn't it deemed unlawful under the Religious discrimination act?
Well it would have been if they had banned Islam.
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by anotheoldgit. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ."Balliol Christian Union (CU) was told the college’s student body, the JCR, wanted the freshers’ fair to be a “secular space”, according to Oxford’s student newspaper Cherwell.
Eventually the CU was told that a single multi-faith stall would be allowed to display leaflets, though no representatives would be allowed to staff it, according to leaked emails seen by the paper. Balliol CU boycotted this option."
Eventually the CU was told that a single multi-faith stall would be allowed to display leaflets, though no representatives would be allowed to staff it, according to leaked emails seen by the paper. Balliol CU boycotted this option."
"Balliol is a tolerant, friendly college where students of all faiths and none are free to worship and express their beliefs openly."
Just not to impressionable young newcomers who will be whisked straight to the union bar and fed snakebite and Aftershock until they vomit their stomach lining, all in the name of education.
Just not to impressionable young newcomers who will be whisked straight to the union bar and fed snakebite and Aftershock until they vomit their stomach lining, all in the name of education.
Islay
Then perhaps you should get in touch with the Expess's sub-Editor, this is the headline he chose:
Oxford College bans Christian Union from freshers' fair as it is 'alienating & homophobic'
Incidentally I did not 'write' my headline I did in fact 'typed' it.
But I am sure that youngmagbog will join me in apologising to you for not taking into consideration your complete lack of simple understanding.
Then perhaps you should get in touch with the Expess's sub-Editor, this is the headline he chose:
Oxford College bans Christian Union from freshers' fair as it is 'alienating & homophobic'
Incidentally I did not 'write' my headline I did in fact 'typed' it.
But I am sure that youngmagbog will join me in apologising to you for not taking into consideration your complete lack of simple understanding.
When you see people using phrases like 'potential harm', you know you are in the realm of young people whose academic intelligence is directly inversely proportional to their life experience and their understanding of the real world they have yet to live in.
The list of 'potential harm' situations for students living away from home for the first time could be a thousand pages long, but in terms of relevance, the 'potential harm' of a Christian society would still be at the bottom of page one-thousand.
Christian students should have as much right to promote their faith as any other - or indeed non-faith students, that's freedom of expression, and should not be supressed without seriously good reason, and 'potential harm' is far to woolly and right-on the be given house room.
The list of 'potential harm' situations for students living away from home for the first time could be a thousand pages long, but in terms of relevance, the 'potential harm' of a Christian society would still be at the bottom of page one-thousand.
Christian students should have as much right to promote their faith as any other - or indeed non-faith students, that's freedom of expression, and should not be supressed without seriously good reason, and 'potential harm' is far to woolly and right-on the be given house room.
AOG - // But I am sure that youngmagbog will join me in apologising to you for not taking into consideration your complete lack of simple understanding. //
Let's do a deal shall we?
Islay won't argue with you about your stunningly patronising attitude, and she won't pick you up on spelling your supporter's name wrongly - that way the thread doesn't get de-railed.
Let's do a deal shall we?
Islay won't argue with you about your stunningly patronising attitude, and she won't pick you up on spelling your supporter's name wrongly - that way the thread doesn't get de-railed.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.