Personnel Management

[oheneba]

"Knowledge of psychology is a sin qua non in personnel management".discuss.

[woofgang]

No it isn't.

[chanel5]

I believe it is.

[bednobs]

so there you have it ... it is and isnt

[rockyracoon]

I'll vote, that it isn't

[Tilly2]

You do need to know how people tick.

[woofgang]

and what makes them go cuckoo.

[Old_Geezer]

It's a sin to try to do without it.

[Prudie]

Most senior personnel managers are nasty pieces of work who rarely care about the psychology of their staff anyway.

[Theland]

In my experience, they have too much influence, and THINK they are psychologists. All poo.

[tonyav]

Human resource managers these day's don't ya know.

[Theland]

Bull poo.

[tonyav]

Yep.

[Theland]

A pity business don't realise the BS that Yooman Rezorzes actually is.

[twix123]

On the one hand, it could be, but on the other, maybe not.

[237SJ]

No. Most so called Managers are more concerned about what they can put on their CV for their next career move.

[Peter Pedant]

This is a question from your course
you read the relevant chapter ( it is november so the chapter no will be under ten) and then write the essay

with a section without psychlogy and examples
and the next section with psychology ( and possibly the same examples) but with a different outcome as a result of the added value

and then a conclusion....

[Toorak]

Write your own essay

[fiction-factory]

>Most senior personnel managers are nasty pieces of work who rarely care about the psychology of their staff anyway.

Ah. Should I remove those years from my CV, Prudie?

[Baldric]

It could be, but there again . . . . . . .