ChatterBank3 mins ago
Film Critics and advertising
On the poster advertising or on the video cover, every film without exception has a film critic stating 'best film of the year' or ' if you are going to see one film this year...' So you pay the money and see the film and its absolute crap with the acting and storyline being Hollyoaks standard and in most cases not even so. Now I acknowledge much of these film critic straplines are down advertising and promotion and the distributer will use the best feedback from the most wellknown critic. But is this critism really down to personal preference, i.e a film is blatently atrocious but Joe Bloggs from the Film Times thinks is great? Or are there backhanders going on? Finally, who are the flim critics you can genuinely trust to be objective?
Thanks in advance, Pootle
Answers
No best answer has yet been selected by Pootle. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.I think a lot of the problems with posters for films is their canny editing of a reviewer's words. A reviewer could write,
'If they thought this was going to be the greatest film ever, they are very much mistaken!'
He could then find it edited to, 'The greatest film ever!'
I doubt he could complain, because he did say those words and in that sequence, even though they weren't in that context.
I agree with coyn about Jonathan Ross. He may be a cheeky chappy, but he knows what the public will enjoy and understands quality. Mark Kermode and Mark Cousins understand what makes a quality film, but I don't think they judge a film by it's entertainment value to the general public.
the only opinion that really counts is your own.if you see the trailer and the film appeals then go and see it !
critics seem to gang together to make it look like they all know what they are on about.the example i will site here is the 'shawshank redemption' - pretty much slammed by every critic but now regarded as one of the best films ever made.
critics are just over paid to over analyse films - sometimes I don't care whether a film is technically very good or there are plot holes - if I am entertained for an hour and a half then I am happy.
Having said that if you are expecting a corker and get a conker you are pretty irritated.
I personally just was a synopsis of the film and i'll decide from that if i want to see it - if it turns out to be crap - so what, if it good - great. if i am not sure i'll wait for the video. I couldn't care less what some stranger thinks
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.